Publication:
25 years of criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management: How intergovernmental C & I processes have made a difference.

dc.contributor.authorLinser, S.
dc.contributor.authorBridge, S.R.J.
dc.contributor.authorGritten, D.
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, S.
dc.contributor.authorPayn, T.
dc.contributor.authorPrins, K.
dc.contributor.authorRaái, R.
dc.contributor.authorRobertson, G.
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-23T18:55:30Z
dc.date.available2022-01-23T18:55:30Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://open.fsc.org/handle/resource/593
dc.title25 years of criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management: How intergovernmental C & I processes have made a difference.en
dcterms.abstractGrowing concern about forest degradation and loss, combined with the political impetus supplied by the Earth Summit in 1992, led to the establishment of eleven intergovernmental, regional, and international forest-related processes focused on the use of criteria and indicators (CandI) for sustainable forest management (SFM). Up to 171 countries have participated in these processes to apply CandI frameworks as a tool for data collection, monitoring, assessment, and reporting on SFM and on achieving various forest-related UN Sustainable Development Goals. Based on an expert survey and literature analysis we identify six interlinked impact domains of CandI efforts: (1) enhanced discourse and understanding of SFM; (2) shaped and focused engagement of science in SFM; (3) improved monitoring and reporting on SFM to facilitate transparency and evidence-based decision-making; (4) strengthened forest management practices; (5) facilitated assessment of progress towards SFM goals; and (6) improved forest-related dialog and communication. We conclude that the 25-year history of CandI work in forestry has had significant positive impacts, though challenges do remain for the implementation of CandI and progress towards SFM. The work should be continued and carried over to other sectors to advance sustainability goals more broadly.en
dcterms.accessRightsPublic
dcterms.accessRightsOpen access
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLinser, S., Wolfslehner, B., Bridge, S.R., Gritten, D., Johnson, S., Payn, T., Prins, K., Raši, R. and Robertson, G., 2018. 25 years of criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management: how intergovernmental CandI processes have made a difference. Forests, 9(9), p.578en
dcterms.issued2018
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.licenseCC-BY-4.0en
dcterms.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
fsc.evidenceCategoryFSC impact-related
fsc.focus.sustainDimensionPolitical, legal, systemic
fsc.issue.economicMarkets
fsc.issue.economicCosts, obstacles, barriers to certification
fsc.subjectForests
fsc.subjectMarkets
fsc.subjectCosts, obstacles, barriers
fsc.subjectCertification
fsc.subjectCertification
is.availability.fullTextFull text available
is.contributor.funderTypePrivate funds (NGOs, companies, VSS self-funded etc)
is.contributor.memberForest Stewardship Council
is.evaluation.collectionInterviews/surveys
is.evaluation.collectionCompany/certified entities /co-op data records
is.evaluation.dataSourceIndependent researcher data
is.evaluation.dataSourceIntergovernmental data (World Bank, UN, FAO data)
is.evidenceSubTypeMonitoring report - collective
is.evidenceTypeMonitoring report
is.focus.productsForestry products
is.focus.sdgSDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals
is.focus.sectorsAgriculture
is.focus.sectorsForestry
is.focus.sustainDimensionSocial
is.focus.sustainIssueForests and other ecosystems
is.focus.sustainLensTransnational governance
is.focus.sustainOutcomeDeforestation and forest protection
is.focus.systemElementMandE outcomes and impacts
is.focus.systemElementMandE performance monitoring
is.identifier.codeImpacts
is.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/f9090578
is.identifier.fscdoihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34800/fsc-international589
is.identifier.schemeNameForest Stewardship Council
is.identifier.schemeTypeVoluntary Sustainability Standards
is.item.reviewStatusPeer reviewed
is.journalNameForests
Download