Do commodity certification systems uphold indigenous peoples' rights? Lessons from the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil and Forest Stewardship Council

Author(s): Colchester, M.
Publication Year: 2016
Publication Type: Report
Source: Policy Matters
Code:
Access to the Study: Open link
Permanent Resource Identifier:
FSC Resource Identifier: Open link
Collections: FSC Research Portal
Abstract

Governments' failure to adequately regulate natural resource use to protect environmental values and human rights has led to the development of 'voluntary' certification systems for several commodities. Two systems that have paid most attention to indigenous peoples' rights are the Forest Stewardship Council and the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil. This article briefly reviews the effectiveness of these two schemes to uphold indigenous peoples' rights with respect to: the certification standards adopted, especially on land and consent; indigenous peoples' participation in scheme governance and standard-setting; the accountability of scheme members to affected indigenous peoples; mechanisms to provide redress for violations of rights; and the barriers or incentives for indigenous producers to market certified products.

Summary
Description
Citation
Colchester, M., Do commodity certification systems uphold indigenous peoples' rights? Lessons from the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil and Forest Stewardship Council, Gland, International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), 2016.
Access Rights: Public, Open access
Certification Body:
Version Number:
Name of the Company:
Sponsors:
License Code:
Relevance for FSC Standard Developers:
Sustainability dimension(s): Social
Topics: Local communities and Indigenous peoples
Subtopics: (not yet curated)
Subject Keywords: Accessibility Indigenous peoples Smallholders
+ 1
Regions: (not yet curated)
Countries: (not yet curated)
Forest Zones: Tropical
Forest Type: Plantation
Tenure Ownership: (not yet curated)
Tenure Management: (not yet curated)
Evidence Category: FSC effect-related studies
Evidence Type: Case study
Evidence Subtype: Qualitative
Data Type: Literature review