Publication: Forest certification on community land in Indonesia
Forest certification on community land in Indonesia
| dc.contributor.author | Hinrichs, A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Irianto, N. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-01-23T18:56:02Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-01-23T18:56:02Z | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://open.fsc.org/handle/resource/700 | |
| dc.title | Forest certification on community land in Indonesia | en |
| dcterms.accessRights | Public | |
| dcterms.accessRights | Open access | |
| dcterms.issued | 2008 | |
| dcterms.language | en | |
| dcterms.publisher | GTZ | |
| dcterms.type | Working Paper | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| fsc.evidenceCategory | FSC impact-related | |
| fsc.focus.forestType | Plantation | |
| fsc.focus.forestZone | Tropical | |
| fsc.focus.sustainDimension | Economic | |
| fsc.focus.sustainDimension | Environmental | |
| fsc.focus.sustainDimension | Social | |
| fsc.focus.tenureManagement | Community | |
| fsc.focus.tenureOwnership | Community | |
| fsc.issue.social | Local communities | |
| fsc.issue.social | Indigenous peoples | |
| fsc.subject | Gender | |
| fsc.subject | Forests | |
| fsc.subject | Certification | |
| fsc.subject | Value Chains | |
| fsc.subject | Agroforestry | |
| fsc.subject | Trees | |
| fsc.subject | Ntfps | |
| fsc.subject | Participation | |
| fsc.topic.economic | Market access | |
| fsc.topic.economic | Price premium | |
| fsc.topic.political | National Forest Policy | |
| is.availability.fullText | Full text available | |
| is.contributor.member | Forest Stewardship Council | |
| is.coverage.country | Indonesia | |
| is.coverage.countryAlpha2 | ID | |
| is.coverage.region | South-eastern Asia | |
| is.evaluation.collection | Mixed methods | |
| is.evaluation.counterfacts | No | |
| is.evaluation.notes | This study examines community forest certification in Indonesia, in all its aspects. The different schemes, FSC and LEI, the certification process, the challenges, benefits and lessons learned exemplified with two case studies of certified community land. Most of the certified land are well managed as a store of value for a long time, so that certification is seen as a valorisation. Donor and institutional support in combination with local leaders fostered the adoption of certification. The local governments expressed the conviction that certification created opportunities for training, environmental awareness, management, and local income. Even the demanding administrative and technical requirements were no barriers that couldn't be overcome. The main positive impacts were clarification of alnd titles, better forest management skills, better internal communication and transparency, but the most important one was better market access, what additionally was the incentive for most smallholder to get certified. Interesting case studies/narratives of the different certified communities are included in the annexes. | |
| is.focus.sectors | Agriculture | |
| is.focus.sectors | Forestry | |
| is.focus.sustainDimension | Economic | |
| is.focus.sustainDimension | Environmental | |
| is.focus.sustainDimension | Social | |
| is.focus.systemElement | MandE outcomes and impacts | |
| is.focus.systemElement | MandE performance monitoring | |
| is.identifier.code | Impacts | |
| is.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.34800/fsc-international446 | |
| is.identifier.schemeName | Forest Stewardship Council | |
| is.identifier.schemeName | Lembaga Ekolabel Indonesia | |
| is.identifier.schemeType | Voluntary Sustainability Standards | |
| is.link.url | https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/32855528/forest-certification-on-community-land-in-indonesia-2008 |