Publication: Challenges for developing Forest Stewardship Council certification for ecosystem services: how to enhance local adoption?
Challenges for developing Forest Stewardship Council certification for ecosystem services: how to enhance local adoption?
| dc.contributor.author | Savilaakso, S. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Guariguata, M.R. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-01-23T18:58:43Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-01-23T18:58:43Z | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://open.fsc.org/handle/resource/1104 | |
| dc.title | Challenges for developing Forest Stewardship Council certification for ecosystem services: how to enhance local adoption? | en |
| dcterms.abstract | The rise of ecosystem services (ES) as a conservation and management tool has changed the way forests are conceived, but so far its translation into management actions has been limited. In this paper, we discuss the development of certification of forest ecosystem services (FES) from the perspective of those implementing it at the local level. We focus on the lessons that emerged from applying the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certification framework at selected sites in Chile, Indonesia, Nepal and Vietnam. | en |
| dcterms.accessRights | Public | |
| dcterms.accessRights | Open access | |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Savilaasko, S. and Guariguata, M.R., 'Challenges for developing Forest Stewardship Council certification for ecosystem services: how to enhance local adoption?', Ecosystem Services, 28, 2017, pg: 55-66 | en |
| dcterms.issued | 2017-12 | |
| dcterms.language | en | |
| dcterms.license | CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0 | en |
| dcterms.type | Journal Article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| fsc.subject | Ecosystem | |
| fsc.subject | Innovation / innovative solutions | |
| is.contributor.member | Forest Stewardship Council | |
| is.coverage.country | Chile | |
| is.coverage.country | Indonesia | |
| is.coverage.country | Nepal | |
| is.coverage.country | Viet Nam | |
| is.coverage.countryAlpha2 | CL | |
| is.coverage.geographicLevel | Region | |
| is.coverage.geographicLevel | Country | |
| is.coverage.latitude | 28.24891365 | |
| is.coverage.latitude | 16.6460167 | |
| is.coverage.latitude | -3.73070989 | |
| is.coverage.latitude | -2.21505456 | |
| is.coverage.longitude | 83.9158264 | |
| is.coverage.longitude | 106.299147 | |
| is.coverage.longitude | -71.38256213 | |
| is.coverage.longitude | 117.2401137 | |
| is.coverage.region | Asia | |
| is.coverage.region | South America | |
| is.evaluation.dataSource | Data by scheme / tool under evaluation | |
| is.evaluation.dataSource | Independent researcher data | |
| is.evidenceResourceType | Primary | |
| is.evidenceSubType | Empirical study - qualitative | |
| is.evidenceType | Empirical study | |
| is.focus.sdg | SDG 13 - Climate Action | |
| is.focus.sdg | SDG 15 - Life on Land | |
| is.focus.sectors | Forestry | |
| is.focus.sustainDimension | Environmental | |
| is.focus.sustainDimension | Social | |
| is.focus.sustainIssue | Climate change | |
| is.focus.sustainIssue | Forests and other ecosystems | |
| is.focus.sustainIssue | Participant costs and benefits | |
| is.focus.sustainIssue | Rights of indigenous peoples and local communities | |
| is.focus.sustainLens | Ecosystem | |
| is.focus.sustainLens | Innovation / innovative solutions | |
| is.focus.sustainOutcome | Afforestation | |
| is.focus.sustainOutcome | Carbon sequestration | |
| is.focus.sustainOutcome | Free prior and informed consent | |
| is.focus.sustainOutcome | Payment for ecosystem services | |
| is.focus.systemElement | MandE outcomes and impacts | |
| is.focus.systemElement | MandE performance monitoring | |
| is.identifier.code | Impacts | |
| is.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.001 | |
| is.identifier.fscdoi | http://dx.doi.org/10.34800/fsc-international560 | |
| is.identifier.schemeName | Forest Stewardship Council | |
| is.identifier.schemeType | Voluntary Sustainability Standards | |
| is.journalName | Ecosystem Services |