Publication:
Effects of Forest Certification on Biodiversity

dc.contributor.authorKuijk, Marijke van
dc.contributor.authorZagt, Roderick J.
dc.contributor.authorPutz, Francis E.
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-23T18:58:39Z
dc.date.available2022-01-23T18:58:39Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://open.fsc.org/handle/resource/1096
dc.titleEffects of Forest Certification on Biodiversityen
dcterms.abstractForest certification is widely seen as an important component of strategies for conserving the world's forests. During the 1990s concern about the loss of biodiversity in logged forests was a key driver behind the emergence of forest certification. It was thought that production forest could play a bigger part in conserving nature by adhering to a strict and widely agreed forest management standard that considers the effects of logging and other forest management activities on biodiversity. Since the introduction of forest certification more than 300 million hectares of forest have been certified under a variety of schemes, the majority of which are located in temperate and boreal areas. Less than 20 million hectares are in the tropics, mostly certified by the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC). Although interest in forest certification has waxed and waned, it remains a cornerstone of forest policies. But does it work? As more than 15 years have passed since the first certificate was issued, it should be possible to evaluate the effectiveness of certified forest management by comparing the conservation performance of certified forests with non-certified forests.en
dcterms.accessRightsPublic
dcterms.accessRightsOpen access
dcterms.bibliographicCitationVan Kuijk, M., Putz, F.E. and Zagt, R.J (2009) Effects of forest certification on biodiversity. Tropenbos International, Wageningen, the Netherlands.en
dcterms.issued2009
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.licenseCopyrighted; all rights reserveden
dcterms.publisherTropenbos International
dcterms.typeReport
dspace.entity.typePublication
fsc.evidenceCategoryFSC impact-related
fsc.focus.sustainDimensionEnvironmental
fsc.issue.environmentalBiodiversity
fsc.subjectSustainabillity Standard
fsc.subjectForests
fsc.subjectMarket
fsc.subjectCertification
fsc.subjectSustainable Market
is.availability.fullTextFull text available
is.contributor.funderTypePrivate funds (NGOs, companies, VSS self-funded etc)
is.contributor.memberForest Stewardship Council
is.evaluation.collectionCompany/certified entities /co-op data records
is.evaluation.collectionFocus Groups
is.evaluation.counterfactsNo
is.evaluation.dataSourceData by scheme / tool under evaluation
is.evaluation.dataSourceIndependent Researcher Data
is.evaluation.quotesThe main conclusion is that in spite of a very large variety in responses between species, the forest management practices associated with forest certification appear to benefit biodiversity in managed forests.
is.evaluation.quotesThere is evidence that ‘good forest management practices' associated with forest certification are beneficial for the conservation of forest biodiversity across species groups and across geographical regions – in spite of variability in responses between species and the existence of exceptions
is.evidenceSubTypeSynthesis paper - literature review
is.evidenceTypeSynthesis paper
is.focus.products#NAME?
is.focus.sdgSDG 15 - Life on Land
is.focus.sectorsAgriculture
is.focus.sectorsForestry
is.focus.sustainDimensionEnvironmental
is.focus.sustainIssuePlant and wildlife conservation
is.focus.sustainLensEcosystem
is.focus.sustainOutcomeSpecies composition
is.focus.systemElementMandE outcomes and impacts
is.focus.systemElementMandE performance monitoring
is.identifier.codeImpacts
is.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34800/fsc-international588
is.identifier.schemeNameForest Stewardship Council
is.identifier.schemeTypeVoluntary Sustainability Standards
is.link.urlhttps://www.fsc-deutschland.de/preview.fsc-und-biodiversitt-engl.a-175.pdf
Download