Publication:
Chemical Use and Forest Certification: Productivity and Economic Implications

dc.contributor.authorMendell, B.C.
dc.contributor.authorLang, A.H.
dc.contributor.authorCaldwell, W.
dc.contributor.authorGarrett, D.L.
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-23T18:56:42Z
dc.date.available2022-01-23T18:56:42Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://open.fsc.org/handle/resource/816
dc.titleChemical Use and Forest Certification: Productivity and Economic Implicationsen
dcterms.abstractForest certification programs provide standards for multiple aspects of forest management, including the use of chemicals for mitigating competition and forest pests. The three most common programs in the UnitedStates—the American Tree Farm System, the Forest Stewardship Council, and the Sustainable ForestryInitiative—all address chemical use. To evaluate relative impacts under different certification schemes, thisresearch estimates productivity and economic implications of a scenario resembling management on nonindustrialprivate forestland. The research compares estimates from a mechanical-only treatment and two levels of chemicaltreatments. Results indicate that strict chemical use restrictions lead to lower levels of forest productivity andreduce potential financial returns. The mechanical scenario generated 6% less volume than the baseline scenario,and the more chemically intensive scenario generated 12% more volume than the baseline. The estimated netpresent value of the mechanical scenario (no chemical use) was 12% less than the baseline.en
dcterms.accessRightsPublic
dcterms.accessRightsOpen access
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMendell, B.C., Lang, A.H., Caldwell, W., and Garrett, D.L. (2015). Chemical use and forest certification: Productivity and economic implications. Journal of Forestry 113, 367–371.en
dcterms.issued2015
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.licenseCopyrighted; all rights reserveden
dcterms.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
fsc.evidenceCategoryFSC impact-related
fsc.focus.forestTypeNatural Forest
fsc.focus.forestTypePlantation
fsc.focus.forestZoneTemperate
fsc.focus.sustainDimensionEconomic
fsc.focus.sustainDimensionEnvironmental
fsc.focus.tenureOwnershipPrivate
fsc.issue.environmentalPesticides
fsc.issue.environmentalFertilizers
fsc.issue.environmentalBiodiversity
fsc.issue.environmentalPlant biodiversity
fsc.subjectForests
fsc.subjectCertification
is.availability.fullTextFull text available
is.contributor.funderTypePrivate funds (NGOs, companies, VSS self-funded etc)
is.contributor.memberForest Stewardship Council
is.coverage.countryUnited States of America
is.coverage.countryAlpha2US
is.coverage.geographicLevelCountry
is.coverage.latitude37.09024
is.coverage.longitude-95.712891
is.coverage.regionNorth America
is.evaluation.counterfactsYes
is.evaluation.dataSourcePrivate company data
is.evidenceSubTypeModeling study - future scenario or potential effects
is.evidenceTypeModeling study
is.extent.number4
is.extent.pages367-371
is.extent.volume113
is.focus.productsTimber products
is.focus.sdgSDG 12 - Responsible Production and Consumption
is.focus.sdgSDG 15 - Life on Land
is.focus.sectorsForestry
is.focus.sustainDimensionEconomic
is.focus.sustainDimensionEnvironmental
is.focus.sustainLensLandscape approaches
is.focus.sustainOutcomeYield
is.focus.sustainOutcomePesticides and herbicides
is.focus.systemElementMandE outcomes and impacts
is.focus.systemElementMandE performance monitoring
is.identifier.codeImpacts
is.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.5849/jof.14-121
is.identifier.fscdoihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34800/fsc-international720
is.identifier.schemeNameForest Stewardship Council
is.identifier.schemeTypeVoluntary Sustainability Standards
is.item.reviewStatusPeer reviewed
is.journalNameJournal of Forestry
Download