Publication: Analysis of forestry work accidents in five Australian forest companies for the period 2004 to 2014
Analysis of forestry work accidents in five Australian forest companies for the period 2004 to 2014
dc.contributor.author | Ghaffariyan, M.R. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-01-23T18:55:32Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-01-23T18:55:32Z | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://open.fsc.org/handle/resource/600 | |
dc.title | Analysis of forestry work accidents in five Australian forest companies for the period 2004 to 2014 | en |
dcterms.accessRights | Public | |
dcterms.accessRights | Open access | |
dcterms.issued | 2016 | |
dcterms.language | en | |
dcterms.type | Journal Article | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
fsc.evidenceCategory | FSC-relevant | |
fsc.subject | Ecological Impacts | |
fsc.subject | Biodiversity | |
fsc.subject | Logging | |
fsc.subject | Brazil | |
fsc.subject | Latin America | |
fsc.subject | Tropics | |
is.availability.fullText | Full text available | |
is.coverage.country | Australia | |
is.coverage.countryAlpha2 | AU | |
is.coverage.region | Oceania | |
is.evaluation.quotes | “We find that low-intensity certified RIL offers the best overall conservation outcomes per unit of wood produced” | |
is.evaluation.quotes | “Our findings are clearest for climate outcomes, and are driven by the potential for forest managers with secure land tenure to resist deforestation where they have a commercial interest in future timber harvests.” | |
is.extent.pages | 545-552 | |
is.extent.volume | 65 | |
is.focus.sectors | Agriculture | |
is.focus.sectors | Forestry | |
is.focus.systemElement | MandE outcomes and impacts | |
is.focus.systemElement | MandE performance monitoring | |
is.identifier.code | Impacts | |
is.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.17221/80/2016-jfs | |
is.identifier.fscdoi | http://dx.doi.org/10.34800/fsc-international723 | |
is.item.reviewStatus | Peer reviewed | |
is.journalName | Journal of Forest Science |