Publication:
Lack of association between deforestation and either sustainability commitments or fines in private concessions in the Peruvian Amazon.

dc.contributor.authorAnderson, C.M.
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-23T18:55:21Z
dc.date.available2022-01-23T18:55:21Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://open.fsc.org/handle/resource/559
dc.titleLack of association between deforestation and either sustainability commitments or fines in private concessions in the Peruvian Amazon.en
dcterms.accessRightsPublic
dcterms.accessRightsLimited access
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAnderson, C. M. 2019. Lack of association between deforestation and either sustainability commitments or fines in private concessions in the Peruvian Amazon. Forest Policy and Economics.en
dcterms.issued2019
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
fsc.evidenceCategoryFSC impact-related
fsc.focus.forestZoneTropical
fsc.focus.sustainDimensionEnvironmental
fsc.issue.environmentalDeforestation, tree cover loss
fsc.subjectDeforestation
fsc.subjectTree cover loss
is.availability.fullTextFull text available
is.contributor.memberForest Stewardship Council
is.coverage.countryPeru
is.coverage.countryAlpha2PE
is.coverage.geographicLevelRegion
is.coverage.latitude-3.423558
is.coverage.longitude-72.786591
is.coverage.regionSouth America
is.evaluation.counterfactsYes
is.evaluation.findingsThe rate of tree cover loss between 2001 and 2011 in FSC-certified concessions was not different from that of uncertified concessions.
is.evaluation.notesCertified and uncertified concessions have various characteristics that potentially influence deforestation outcomes (privately vs publicly owned; owned by firms vs individuals)
is.evaluation.outcomeyes
is.evaluation.significanceStatistically significant
is.evidenceResourceTypePrimary
is.evidenceSubTypeEmpirical study - with matched control, data collected post-intervention
is.evidenceSummaryThis study examines privately allocated concessions in the Peruvian Amazon to determine whether sustainability commitments correspond with lower deforestation rates, and whether fines correspond with higher deforestation rates.
is.evidenceTypeEmpirical study
is.focus.sectorsAgriculture
is.focus.sectorsForestry
is.focus.sustainDimensionEnvironmental
is.focus.sustainLensAudits and assurance
is.focus.sustainLensEcosystem
is.focus.systemElementMandE outcomes and impacts
is.focus.systemElementMandE performance monitoring
is.identifier.codeImpacts
is.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.03.010
is.identifier.fscdoihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34800/fsc-international836
is.identifier.schemeNameForest Stewardship Council
is.identifier.schemeTypeVoluntary Sustainability Standards
is.item.reviewStatusPeer reviewed
is.journalNameForest Policy and Economics
Download