Forest certification: More than a market-based tool, experiences from the Asia Pacific region

View/Open
Date
Submission date
Authors
Lewin, A.
Mo, K.
Scheyvens, H.
Gabai, S.
Type
Journal Article
Version number
Status

Over the last 25 years, the global area of certified forests has grown rapidly and voluntary forest certification has become recognized as an effective tool to engage international markets in improving sustainability within forest management units. However, the bulk of this growth has occurred in North America, Northern Europe, Australia, and New Zealand, with relatively limited uptake in the tropics. Since its creation, forest certification has been largely understood as a "market-based" mechanism, in contrast to government-led policies and regulations. Through the experience of the Responsible Asia Forestry and Trade (RAFT) partnership in the Asia Pacific region, we find that the framing of forest certification as voluntary and market-based, and as a mechanism to overcome governance failure, has created an artificial dichotomy. In this dichotomy, voluntary certification and regulatory measures to promote sustainable forest management are conceived of and pursued largely independently. We argue that it is more constructive to view them as complementary approaches that share a common goal of increasing sustainability across the forestry sector. In practice, forest certification interacts with conventional governance institutions and mechanisms. Understanding these interactions and their implications, as well as additional possibilities for interaction, will help in realizing the full potential of forest certification.

Subject Keywords
Forests, Certification
Sponsors
Description
Identifiers
Forest Type
Natural Forest
Plantation
Forest Zone
Tropical
Code
Effective date
Review year
Alternative Strategy
Alternative Type
Pest Type
Alternative Trial
Coverage Country
Malaysia
Indonesia
Papua New Guinea
Viet Nam
Lao People's Democratic Republic
Method
Active Ingredient
Permanent Record Identifier