Publication:
The Effects of FSC-Certification in Latvia. An Analysis of Corrective Action Requests

dc.contributor.authorHirschberger, P.
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-23T18:56:10Z
dc.date.available2022-01-23T18:56:10Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://open.fsc.org/handle/resource/726
dc.titleThe Effects of FSC-Certification in Latvia. An Analysis of Corrective Action Requestsen
dcterms.accessRightsPublic
dcterms.accessRightsOpen access
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHirschberger, P., 2005. The Effects of FSC-Certification in Latvia. An Analysis of Corrective Action Requestsen
dcterms.issued2005
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.licenseCopyrighted; all rights reserveden
dcterms.publisherWorld Wide Fund for Nature
dcterms.typeReport
dspace.entity.typePublication
fsc.evidenceCategoryFSC impact-related
fsc.focus.forestZoneTemperate
fsc.focus.sustainDimensionEnvironmental
fsc.focus.sustainDimensionSocial
fsc.focus.sustainDimensionEconomic
fsc.focus.tenureManagementPublic
fsc.focus.tenureOwnershipPublic
fsc.issue.environmentalWater and soil
fsc.issue.environmentalBiodiversity
fsc.issue.environmentalHigh Conservation Values
fsc.issue.socialWorkers
fsc.subjectForests
fsc.subjectCertification
fsc.topic.economicImproved management
fsc.topic.socialHealth and safety
fsc.topic.socialWorking conditions
fsc.topic.socialLocal communities
fsc.topic.socialIndigenous Peoples
fsc.topic.socialLivelihoods
fsc.topic.socialConsultation, participation, empowerment
is.availability.fullTextFull text available
is.contributor.funderTypePrivate funds (NGOs, companies, VSS self-funded etc)
is.contributor.memberForest Stewardship Council
is.coverage.countryLatvia
is.coverage.countryAlpha2LV
is.coverage.geographicLevelCountry
is.coverage.latitude56.879635
is.coverage.longitude24.603189
is.coverage.regionEurope
is.evaluation.collectionCompany/certified entities /co-op data records
is.evaluation.counterfactsNo
is.evaluation.dataSourcePrivate company data
is.evaluation.notesThis is a CAR-analysis of FM CHs in Latvia, including the state forests.50% of CARs raised concerned ecological issues, and communal and privately owned forests had particularly high levels of non-conformities concerning ecological requirements. More particularly, certification audits allowed to improve biological monitoring and training in modern environmental practices, and enforced the implementation of legal requirements. It also allowed the identification and protection of High Conservation Value forests and woodland key habitats, enforced the monitoring of threatened species, increased the amount of biotope trees and dead wood, and the use of a broader range of tree species for regeneration. Finally, the certification reduced the risk of soil damage and compaction caused by heavy machines, and the risk of use of chemical substances.
is.evaluation.quotesThe conclusion can be drawn that certification according to FSC has conserved and improved biodiversity in large parts of Latvia, especially at a time when these issues were still debated on a national level and legal stipulations were unclear or weak.
is.evidenceSubTypeDescriptive information - contextual and operational
is.evidenceTypeDescriptive information
is.focus.productsOther forestry and logging
is.focus.sdgSDG 15 - Life on Land
is.focus.sectorsForestry
is.focus.sustainDimensionEnvironmental
is.focus.sustainDimensionSocial
is.focus.sustainDimensionEconomic
is.focus.sustainIssueForests and other ecosystems
is.focus.sustainLensAudits and assurance
is.focus.sustainOutcomeEcosystem quality
is.focus.sustainOutcomeDeforestation and forest protection
is.focus.sustainOutcomeOccupational health and safety
is.focus.sustainOutcomeConsumer preferences
is.focus.systemElementMandE outcomes and impacts
is.focus.systemElementMandE performance monitoring
is.identifier.codeImpacts
is.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34800/fsc-international302
is.identifier.schemeNameForest Stewardship Council
is.identifier.schemeTypeVoluntary Sustainability Standards
is.link.urlhttps://wwfeu.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/fscsummaryanalysisallcountries.pdf
Download