Publication: Certification: The view from FSC-Certified Land Managers
Certification: The view from FSC-Certified Land Managers
| dc.contributor.author | Hartsfield, A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ostermeier, D. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-01-23T18:56:42Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-01-23T18:56:42Z | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://open.fsc.org/handle/resource/815 | |
| dc.title | Certification: The view from FSC-Certified Land Managers | en |
| dcterms.abstract | Forest Stewardship Council certification emerged nearly a decade ago, and its growth has been both applauded and criticized. To learn more about the impacts of certification, in 2002 we conducted a survey of FSC-certified forest management organizations in North America, fo- cusing on forest managers' goals for seeking certification, the land management impacts of certification, and the overall benefits and costs of certification. Results indicate FSC certification seems to be representing the interests of those who call for greater forest management ac- countability, but it addresses the interests of the forest managers themselves less well. | en |
| dcterms.accessRights | Public | |
| dcterms.accessRights | Open access | |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Hartsfield, A. and Ostermeier, D., 2003. Certification: the view from FSC-certified land managers. Journal of Forestry, 101(8), pp.32-36. | en |
| dcterms.issued | 2003 | |
| dcterms.language | en | |
| dcterms.license | Copyrighted; all rights reserved | en |
| dcterms.type | Journal Article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| fsc.evidenceCategory | FSC impact-related | |
| fsc.focus.sustainDimension | Economic | |
| fsc.focus.tenureOwnership | Private | |
| fsc.issue.economic | Benefits, motivations, reasons for certification | |
| fsc.issue.economic | Costs, obstacles, barriers to certification | |
| fsc.issue.environmental | Forest disturbance, forest degradation | |
| fsc.subject | Forests | |
| fsc.subject | Certification | |
| is.availability.fullText | Full text available | |
| is.contributor.funderType | Private funds (NGOs, companies, VSS self-funded etc) | |
| is.contributor.member | Forest Stewardship Council | |
| is.coverage.country | United States of America | |
| is.coverage.countryAlpha2 | US | |
| is.coverage.geographicLevel | Country | |
| is.coverage.latitude | 37.09024 | |
| is.coverage.longitude | -95.712891 | |
| is.coverage.region | North America | |
| is.evaluation.collection | Interviews/surveys with certified entities and their representatives and workers/producers | |
| is.evaluation.counterfacts | No | |
| is.evaluation.dataSource | Private company data | |
| is.evidenceSubType | Descriptive information - contextual and operational | |
| is.evidenceType | Descriptive information | |
| is.extent.number | 8 | |
| is.extent.pages | 32-36 | |
| is.extent.volume | 101 | |
| is.focus.products | Timber products | |
| is.focus.sdg | SDG 15 - Life on Land | |
| is.focus.sectors | Forestry | |
| is.focus.sustainDimension | Economic | |
| is.focus.sustainDimension | Environmental | |
| is.focus.sustainIssue | Forests and other ecosystems | |
| is.focus.sustainIssue | Participant costs and benefits | |
| is.focus.sustainLens | Audits and assurance | |
| is.focus.sustainOutcome | Ecosystem quality | |
| is.focus.sustainOutcome | Cost of inputs | |
| is.focus.systemElement | MandE outcomes and impacts | |
| is.focus.systemElement | MandE performance monitoring | |
| is.identifier.code | Impacts | |
| is.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.34800/fsc-international360 | |
| is.identifier.schemeName | Forest Stewardship Council | |
| is.identifier.schemeType | Voluntary Sustainability Standards | |
| is.item.reviewStatus | Peer reviewed | |
| is.journalName | Journal of Forestry | |
| is.link.url | https://academic.oup.com/jof/article/101/8/32/4613108 |