Publication:
Intact Forest in Selective Logging Landscapes in the Tropics.

dc.contributor.authorPutz, F.E.
dc.contributor.authorGriscom, B.W.
dc.contributor.authorGopalakrishna, T.
dc.contributor.authorRoopsind, A.
dc.contributor.authorUmunay, P.M.
dc.contributor.authorZalman, J.
dc.contributor.authorEllis, E.A.
dc.contributor.authorRuslandi
dc.contributor.authorEllis, P.W.
dc.contributor.authorBaker, T.
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-23T18:55:20Z
dc.date.available2022-01-23T18:55:20Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://open.fsc.org/handle/resource/556
dc.languageen
dc.rightsOpen access
dc.titleIntact Forest in Selective Logging Landscapes in the Tropics.en
dcterms.abstractThe selective logging that characterizes most timber extraction operations in the tropics leaves large patches of logging blocks (i.e., areas allocated for harvesting) intact, without evidence of direct impacts. For example, in ~10,000 ha sampled in 48 forest management enterprises in Africa (Gabon, Republic of Congo, and the Democratic Republic of Congo), Indonesia, Suriname, and Mexico, an average of 69% (range 20–97%) of the area in logging blocks was not directly affected by timber harvests. The proportion of intact forest within logging blocks decreased very slightly with increases in harvest intensity in the accessed portion of the logging blocks (9–86 m3 ha−1) but decreased strongly with harvest intensity in entire logging blocks (0.3–48.2 m3 ha−1). More forest was left intact in areas farther from roads, on slopes >40%, and within 25 m of perennial streams, but the effect sizes of each of these variables was small (~8%). It is less clear how much of the intact forest left after one harvest will remain intact through the next. Conservation benefits without reductions in timber yields will derive from better management planning so that sensitive and ecologically critical areas, such as steep slopes and riparian buffers, constitute large and permanent proportions of the intact forest in selectively logged landscapes in the tropics.en
dcterms.issued2019
dcterms.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
fsc.evidenceCategoryFSC effect-related studies
fsc.focus.forestType(not yet curated)
fsc.focus.forestZoneTropical
fsc.focus.sustainDimension1. Economic
fsc.focus.sustainDimension2. Environmental
fsc.focus.tenureManagement(not yet curated)
fsc.focus.tenureOwnership(not yet curated)
fsc.issue.environmental(not yet curated)
fsc.topic.environmental1.5. Profitability
fsc.topic.environmental2.2. Forest degradation
fscdoc.hashidden.adminyes
fscdoc.hashidden.useryes
fscdoc.intransitionno
is.coverage.countryMexico
is.coverage.countrySuriname
is.coverage.countryGabon
is.coverage.countryCongo
is.coverage.countryDemocratic Republic of the Congo
is.coverage.countryIndonesia
is.coverage.region(not yet curated)
is.evaluation.collectionField Measurements
is.evaluation.collectionMapping
is.evidenceSubTypePatterns at a large scale using context variables
is.evidenceTypeModeling study
is.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2019.00030
is.identifier.fscdoihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34800/fsc-international395
is.journalNameFrontiers in Forest and Global Change
Download