Publication: Perspectives and Attitudes of Forest Products Industry Companies on the Chain of Custody Certification: A Case Study From Turkey
Perspectives and Attitudes of Forest Products Industry Companies on the Chain of Custody Certification: A Case Study From Turkey
| dc.contributor.author | Tolunay, A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Türkoğlu, T. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-01-23T18:56:36Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-01-23T18:56:36Z | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://open.fsc.org/handle/resource/801 | |
| dc.language | en | |
| dc.rights | Open access | |
| dc.title | Perspectives and Attitudes of Forest Products Industry Companies on the Chain of Custody Certification: A Case Study From Turkey | en |
| dcterms.abstract | The perspectives and attitudes of the companies of the forest products industry operating in the fields of solid wood products, pulp, paper and paperboard products, engineered wood products and furniture manufacturing in Turkey on the chain of custody certification system and certified forest products were investigated. Within this scope, face-to-face interviews were conducted with the managers or owners of 177 companies. The data were obtained by using the questionnaire technique. The research methods included descriptive statistics, one-way analysis of variance and the Duncan test. As a result, it was detected that there are differences in the perspectives and attitudes towards the chain of custody certification system of the companies operating in the four main branches of the forest products industry in Turkey. It was revealed by this survey that chain of custody (CoC) certification was known mostly by the companies operating in pulp, paper and paperboard companies. The certification most demanded is the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) CoC certification, with a share of 15%; and Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC) CoC is demanded by 2% of companies. | en |
| dcterms.issued | 2014 | |
| dcterms.type | Journal Article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| fsc.evidenceCategory | FSC effect-related studies | |
| fsc.focus.forestType | (not yet curated) | |
| fsc.focus.forestZone | (not yet curated) | |
| fsc.focus.sustainDimension | 1. Economic | |
| fsc.focus.tenureManagement | (not yet curated) | |
| fsc.focus.tenureOwnership | (not yet curated) | |
| fsc.issue.environmental | (not yet curated) | |
| fsc.topic.environmental | Demand | |
| fscdoc.hashidden.admin | yes | |
| fscdoc.hashidden.user | yes | |
| fscdoc.intransition | no | |
| is.coverage.country | Turkey | |
| is.coverage.region | Europe | |
| is.evaluation.collection | Interviews/surveys | |
| is.evidenceSubType | Qualitative | |
| is.evidenceType | Case study | |
| is.extent.pages | 857-971 | |
| is.extent.volume | 6 | |
| is.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.3390/su6020857 | |
| is.identifier.fscdoi | http://dx.doi.org/10.34800/fsc-international418 | |
| is.journalName | Sustainability |