Publication:
Financial analysis and comparison of smallholder forest and state forest enterprise plantations in Central Vietnam.

dc.contributor.authorFrey, G.E.
dc.contributor.authorHa, T.T.T.
dc.contributor.authorDavis, R.R.
dc.contributor.authorCarle, J.B.
dc.contributor.authorThon, V.X.
dc.contributor.authorDzung, N.V.
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-23T18:55:26Z
dc.date.available2022-01-23T18:55:26Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://open.fsc.org/handle/resource/577
dc.titleFinancial analysis and comparison of smallholder forest and state forest enterprise plantations in Central Vietnam.en
dcterms.accessRightsPublic
dcterms.accessRightsLimited access
dcterms.bibliographicCitationFrey, G. E. et al. 2018. Financial analysis and comparison of smallholder forest and state forest enterprise plantations in Central Vietnam. International Forestry Review.en
dcterms.issued2018
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
fsc.evidenceCategoryFSC impact-related
fsc.focus.forestZoneTropical
fsc.focus.sustainDimensionEconomic
fsc.issue.economicMarkets
fsc.topic.economicPrice premium
is.availability.fullTextFull text available
is.contributor.memberForest Stewardship Council
is.coverage.countryViet Nam
is.coverage.countryAlpha2VN
is.coverage.regionSouth-eastern Asia
is.evaluation.counterfactsYes
is.evaluation.findingsWood revenues from plantations were approximately 10-30% higher for FSC-certified forest managed by smallholders than for uncertified forests managed by smallholders.
is.evaluation.findingsThe land expectation value, characterizing financial optimality when land availability is constrained, was on average 25% higher for FSC-certified smallholders than for conventional ones.
is.evaluation.findingsThe internal rate of return, characterizing financial optimality when cash or time are constrained, was similar for FSC-certified and conventional smallholders.
is.evaluation.outcomeyes
is.evaluation.significanceStatistically significant
is.evidenceSubTypeEmpirical study - qualitative
is.evidenceTypeEmpirical study
is.focus.sectorsAgriculture
is.focus.sectorsForestry
is.focus.sustainDimensionEconomic
is.focus.systemElementMandE outcomes and impacts
is.focus.systemElementMandE performance monitoring
is.identifier.codeImpacts
is.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1505/146554818823767582
is.identifier.fscdoihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34800/fsc-international432
is.identifier.schemeNameForest Stewardship Council
is.identifier.schemeTypeVoluntary Sustainability Standards
is.item.reviewStatusPeer reviewed
is.journalNameInternational Forestry Review
Download