Publication:
Implementing the rights of indigenous peoples in Japan: implications and challenges of forest certification for the Ainu

dc.contributor.authorNagai, F.
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-23T18:56:08Z
dc.date.available2022-01-23T18:56:08Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://open.fsc.org/handle/resource/720
dc.titleImplementing the rights of indigenous peoples in Japan: implications and challenges of forest certification for the Ainuen
dcterms.accessRightsPublic
dcterms.accessRightsLimited access
dcterms.bibliographicCitationFumiya, N., 'Implementing the rights of indigenous peoples in Japan: implications and challenges of forest certification for the Ainu', The International Journal of Human Rights, 23:1-2, 2019, 249-266.en
dcterms.issued2019
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
fsc.evidenceCategoryFSC impact-related
fsc.focus.fmPrincipleIndigenous Peoples' Rights
fsc.focus.forestTypeNatural Forest
fsc.focus.sustainDimensionSocial
fsc.subjectForests
fsc.subjectCertification
fsc.subjectIndigenous peoples
is.availability.fullTextFull text available
is.contact.emailf.nagai.723@gmail.com
is.contributor.memberForest Stewardship Council
is.coverage.countryJapan
is.coverage.countryAlpha2JP
is.coverage.regionEastern Asia
is.evidenceResourceTypePrimary
is.evidenceSubTypeDescriptive information - contextual and operational
is.evidenceSubTypeDescriptive information - field learning, stories and situations
is.evidenceSubTypeMonitoring report - basic
is.evidenceSummaryIn 2008, the Government of Japan recognised the Ainu as an indigenous people after the adoption of the U.N. Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) in 2007. it also marked the beginning of the development of the Ainu policy, which resulted in a poor implementation of UNDRIP. In this context, standards have appeared in the space, because its systems require compliance with the UNDRIP. This article explores the impact of forest certification in relation to the Ainu indigenous rights.
is.evidenceTypeDescriptive information
is.evidenceTypeMonitoring report
is.extent.pages249-266
is.extent.volume23
is.focus.sdgSDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
is.focus.sdgSDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals
is.focus.sectorsAgriculture
is.focus.sectorsForestry
is.focus.sustainDimensionSocial
is.focus.sustainIssueLivelihoods
is.focus.sustainIssueRights of indigenous peoples and local communities
is.focus.sustainLensIndigenous peoples
is.focus.sustainOutcomeCommunity development and infrastructure
is.focus.sustainOutcomeConflict resolution
is.focus.sustainOutcomeFree prior and informed consent
is.focus.sustainOutcomeGovernance mechanisms
is.focus.sustainOutcomeLand rights
is.focus.sustainOutcomeLand tenure
is.focus.systemElementMandE outcomes and impacts
is.focus.systemElementMandE performance monitoring
is.identifier.codeImpacts
is.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2019.1581770
is.identifier.fscdoihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34800/fsc-international433
is.identifier.schemeNameForest Stewardship Council
is.identifier.schemeTypeVoluntary Sustainability Standards
is.item.reviewStatusPeer reviewed
is.journalNameInternational Journal of Human Rights
Download