Forest Certification in Russia

Author(s): Tysiachniouk, M.
Publication Year: 2006
Publication Type: Book Chapter
Source:
Code:
Access to the Study: Open link
Permanent Resource Identifier:
FSC Resource Identifier: Open link
Collections: FSC Research Portal
Abstract

Even though Russian society and timber markets do not have entrenched values of environmentalism, market forces have cross-border influence and through certification sustainable forestry can be imported to Russia. There are national and Pan European initiatives in Russia, which are in the initial stages with processes much less developed then FSC. FSC is also in the early stages. However it has the potential to develop in the European part of Russia. It is driven both by NGO networks and business. This paper shows the detailed processes through which FSC is imported to Russia and chains of supply are linked to chains of demands. It compares the effectiveness of FSC adoption in the European part of Russia versus that in Asian Russia, where markets show less sensitivity to the value of sustainable forestry. The paper demonstrates an essential role of environmental NGO networks, especially WWF and Greenpeace, in promoting FSC. The paper analyzes how new institutions related to FSC are taking hold in Russia and the economic, social and environmental impacts of certification.

Summary
Description
Citation
Tysiachniouk, Maria. "Forest certification in Russia." Confronting sustainability: forest certification in developing and transitioning countries (2006): 261-295.
Access Rights: Public, Open access
Certification Body:
Version Number:
Name of the Company:
Sponsors:
License Code:
Relevance for FSC Standard Developers:
Sustainability dimension(s): Economic Environmental Social
Topics: Market Compositional diversity Local communities and Indigenous peoples
+ 1
Subtopics: Demand Consultation and participation Illegal activities
Subject Keywords: Forests Certification
Regions: Europe
Countries: Russian Federation
Forest Zones: Boreal
Forest Type: Natural Forest
Tenure Ownership: Public
Tenure Management: (not yet curated)
Evidence Category: FSC effect-related studies
Evidence Type: Case study
Evidence Subtype: Qualitative
Data Type: (not yet curated)