Publication:
Carbon emissions and potential emissions reductions from low-intensity selective logging in southwestern Amazonia.

dc.contributor.authorGoodman, R.C.
dc.contributor.authorGopalakrishna, T.
dc.contributor.authorPutz, Francis E.
dc.contributor.authorGutiérrez, L.N.
dc.contributor.authorMena Alvarez, J.L.
dc.contributor.authorAguilar-Amuchastegui, N.
dc.contributor.authorEllis, P.W.
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-23T18:55:21Z
dc.date.available2022-01-23T18:55:21Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://open.fsc.org/handle/resource/558
dc.titleCarbon emissions and potential emissions reductions from low-intensity selective logging in southwestern Amazonia.en
dcterms.accessRightsPublic
dcterms.accessRightsLimited access
dcterms.bibliographicCitationGoodman, R. C. et al. 2019. carbon dioxide emissions and potential emissions reductions from low-intensity selective logging in southwestern Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management.en
dcterms.issued2019
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
fsc.evidenceCategoryFSC impact-related
fsc.focus.forestZoneTropical
fsc.focus.sustainDimensionEnvironmental
fsc.focus.sustainDimensionEconomic
fsc.issue.economicForest management
fsc.issue.environmentalForest disturbance, forest deagradation
fsc.subjectCarbon stock
fsc.subjectCarbon dioxide emissions
fsc.subjectHarvesting
fsc.topic.environmentalCarbon
fsc.topic.environmentalHarvesting
is.availability.fullTextFull text available
is.contributor.memberForest Stewardship Council
is.coverage.countryPeru
is.coverage.countryAlpha2PE
is.coverage.regionSouth America
is.evaluation.counterfactsYes
is.evaluation.findingsTotal carbon emissions per hectare were greater in non-certified operations than in certified operations.
is.evaluation.findingsUnintended carbon emissions (emissions excluding those from extracted timber itself) resulting from collateral damage from individual harvested trees averaged lower in certified operations than in uncertified ones.
is.evaluation.findingsTotal carbon emissions per unit volume timber extracted were not different in certified and non-certified operations.
is.evaluation.findingsCertified operations damaged less than half as many residual commercial species per felled tree as non-certified operations.
is.evaluation.findingsHaul roads were larger in certified operations than in uncertified ones.
is.evaluation.findingsFor a given biomass of felled tree, mass of extracted logs was greater in certified operations than in uncertified ones.
is.evaluation.findingsCertified operations harvested at lower intensities than uncertified ones, either in terms of trees or volume per hectare.
is.evaluation.outcomeyes
is.evaluation.significanceStatistically significant
is.evidenceSubTypeEmpirical study - control not matched but some confounders taken into account - data collected post-intervention
is.evidenceTypeEmpirical study
is.focus.sectorsAgriculture
is.focus.sectorsForestry
is.focus.sustainDimensionEnvironmental
is.focus.sustainDimensionEconomic
is.focus.systemElementMandE outcomes and impacts
is.focus.systemElementMandE performance monitoring
is.identifier.codeImpacts
is.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.02.037
is.identifier.fscdoihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34800/fsc-international470
is.identifier.schemeNameForest Stewardship Council
is.identifier.schemeTypeVoluntary Sustainability Standards
is.item.reviewStatusPeer reviewed
is.journalNameForest Ecology and Management
Download
Collections