Publication:
Can the SDGs provide a basis for supply chain decisions in the construction sector?

dc.contributor.authorRussell, E.
dc.contributor.authorClift, R.
dc.contributor.authorLee, J.
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-23T18:56:38Z
dc.date.available2022-01-23T18:56:38Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://open.fsc.org/handle/resource/807
dc.titleCan the SDGs provide a basis for supply chain decisions in the construction sector?en
dcterms.abstractThe Construction sector is characterised by complex supply networks delivering unique end products over short time scales. Sustainability has increased in importance but continues to be difficult to implement in this sector; thus, new approaches and practices are needed. This paper reports an empirical investigation into the value of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), especially Sustainable Consumption and Production (SDG12), when used as a framework for action by organisations to drive change towards sustainability in global supply networks. Through inductive research, two different and contrasting approaches to improving the sustainability of supply networks have been revealed. One approach focuses on the "bottom up" ethical approach typified by the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certification of timber products, and the other on "top-down" regulations exemplified by the UK Modern Slavery Act. In an industry noted for complex supply networks and characterised by adversarial relationships, the findings suggest that, in the long term, promoting shared values aligned with transparent, third-party monitoring will be more effective than imposing standards through legislation and regulation in supporting sustainable consumption and production.en
dcterms.accessRightsPublic
dcterms.accessRightsOpen access
dcterms.bibliographicCitationRussell, E., Lee, J. and Clift, R., 2018. Can the SDGs provide a basis for supply chain decisions in the construction sector?. Sustainability, 10(3), p.629.en
dcterms.issued2018
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.licenseCC-BY-4.0en
dcterms.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
fsc.evidenceCategoryFSC impact-related
fsc.focus.sustainDimensionPolitical, legal, systemic
fsc.focus.sustainDimensionSocial
fsc.issue.environmentalBiodiversity
fsc.issue.environmentalPlant biodiversity
fsc.subjectForests
fsc.subjectCertification
fsc.topic.socialForced labour
is.availability.fullTextFull text available
is.contributor.funderTypePrivate funds (NGOs, companies, VSS self-funded etc)
is.contributor.memberForest Stewardship Council
is.coverage.countryUnited Kingdom
is.coverage.countryAlpha2GB
is.coverage.geographicLevelCountry
is.coverage.latitude55.378051
is.coverage.longitude-3.435973
is.coverage.regionEurope
is.evaluation.collectionInterviews/surveys with certified entities and their representatives and workers/producers
is.evaluation.dataSourcePrivate company data
is.evidenceSubTypeDescriptive information - contextual and operational
is.evidenceTypeDescriptive information
is.extent.number3
is.extent.volume10
is.focus.productsForestry products
is.focus.sdgSDG 12 - Responsible Production and Consumption
is.focus.sectorsForestry
is.focus.sustainDimensionSocial
is.focus.sustainIssueConsumers and supply chains
is.focus.sustainLensSupply chain benefits
is.focus.sustainOutcomeForced or bonded labor
is.focus.sustainOutcomeSustainable sourcing
is.focus.systemElementMandE outcomes and impacts
is.focus.systemElementMandE performance monitoring
is.identifier.codeImpacts
is.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/su10030629
is.identifier.fscdoihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34800/fsc-international474
is.identifier.schemeNameForest Stewardship Council
is.identifier.schemeTypeVoluntary Sustainability Standards
is.item.reviewStatusPeer reviewed
is.journalNameSustainability
Download