Publication: Local perceptions of forest certification for community-based enterprises
Local perceptions of forest certification for community-based enterprises
| dc.contributor.author | Humphries, S.S. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kainer, K.A. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-01-23T18:55:36Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-01-23T18:55:36Z | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://open.fsc.org/handle/resource/614 | |
| dc.title | Local perceptions of forest certification for community-based enterprises | en |
| dcterms.accessRights | Public | |
| dcterms.accessRights | Limited access | |
| dcterms.issued | 2006 | |
| dcterms.language | en | |
| dcterms.type | Journal Article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| fsc.evidenceCategory | FSC impact-related | |
| fsc.focus.forestZone | Tropical | |
| fsc.focus.sustainDimension | Social | |
| fsc.focus.sustainDimension | Economic | |
| fsc.focus.tenureManagement | Community | |
| fsc.focus.tenureOwnership | Community | |
| fsc.issue.economic | Benefits, motivations, reasons for certification | |
| fsc.issue.economic | Costs, obstacles, barriers to certification | |
| fsc.subject | Forests | |
| fsc.subject | Certification | |
| is.availability.fullText | Full text available | |
| is.contributor.member | Forest Stewardship Council | |
| is.coverage.country | Brazil | |
| is.coverage.countryAlpha2 | BR | |
| is.coverage.region | South America | |
| is.evaluation.collection | Interviews/surveys | |
| is.evaluation.counterfacts | No | |
| is.evaluation.quotes | When asked if certification was worth it, most stakeholders interviewed affirmed that it was, and that certified operations should maintain certification into the future. Furthermore, both manejadores and representatives of the principal supportorganizations stated they do or would recommend certification to other communities. | |
| is.evaluation.quotes | Two particular conditions may have enabled operations in this study to overcome common constraints for CFEs: (1) membership in a regionalproducers group, and (2) strong political, technical, and financial support from the state government. Their experiences specifically highlight the need to adapt the certification process for CFEs and demonstrate that obtaining market benefits is possible. | |
| is.evidenceType | Empirical study | |
| is.extent.number | 1-3 | |
| is.extent.pages | 30-43 | |
| is.extent.volume | 235 | |
| is.focus.sectors | Agriculture | |
| is.focus.sectors | Forestry | |
| is.focus.sustainDimension | Social | |
| is.focus.sustainDimension | Economic | |
| is.focus.systemElement | MandE outcomes and impacts | |
| is.focus.systemElement | MandE performance monitoring | |
| is.identifier.code | Impacts | |
| is.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.07.027 | |
| is.identifier.fscdoi | http://dx.doi.org/10.34800/fsc-international488 | |
| is.identifier.schemeName | Forest Stewardship Council | |
| is.identifier.schemeType | Voluntary Sustainability Standards | |
| is.item.reviewStatus | Peer reviewed | |
| is.journalName | Forest Ecology and Management |