Publication:
Certification with Russian characteristics: Implications for social and environmental equity

dc.contributor.authorTysiachniouk, Maria
dc.contributor.authorMcDermott, C.L.
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-23T18:56:25Z
dc.date.available2022-01-23T18:56:25Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://open.fsc.org/handle/resource/771
dc.titleCertification with Russian characteristics: Implications for social and environmental equityen
dcterms.accessRightsPublic
dcterms.accessRightsLimited access
dcterms.issued2016
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
fsc.evidenceCategoryFSC impact-related
fsc.focus.forestTypeNatural Forest
fsc.focus.forestZoneBoreal
fsc.focus.sustainDimensionSocial
fsc.focus.sustainDimensionEnvironmental
fsc.issue.environmentalHigh Conservation Values
fsc.issue.environmentalDeforestation, tree cover loss
fsc.issue.socialLocal communities
fsc.issue.socialIndigenous peoples
fsc.subjectForests
fsc.subjectPolitical Impacts
fsc.subjectForest policy
fsc.subjectCertification
fsc.topic.politicalPublic/state influence
fsc.topic.politicallocal context
fsc.topic.socialConsultation, participation, empowerment
is.availability.fullTextFull text available
is.contributor.memberForest Stewardship Council
is.coverage.countryRussian Federation
is.coverage.countryAlpha2RU
is.coverage.regionEastern Europe
is.evaluation.collectionCase studies
is.evaluation.collectionInterviews/surveys
is.evaluation.counterfactsNo
is.evaluation.notesInteresting perspective on the importance of context, or 'enabling conditions' needed for effective implementation of the standards: the need for 'multi-scale advocacy coalitions'
is.evaluation.quotesThis case highlights how FSC's requirements for the protection of HCV forests were supported by strong and sustained transnational environmental networks, stretching from the node of design to the site of implementation, working both inside and outside of the FSC system.
is.evaluation.quotesEven with the extra efforts of this NGO, however, the impact of certification on the distribution of material benefits to local communities was minimal. In particular, certification failed to address local community concerns over the loss of small and medium forest enterprises, the high price of fuelwood, and loss of local access to sawnwood and building materials.
is.evaluation.quoteswe find no evidence that certification was addressing local community concerns for distributive equity. In particular, certification had failed to address the loss of small and medium forest enterprises, loss of local access to sawnwood and rising costs of fuelwood. This highlights the power dynamics of global standards implementation and the need for multi-scale advocacy coalitions to ensure their effective implementation.
is.evidenceTypeEmpirical study
is.focus.sectorsAgriculture
is.focus.sectorsForestry
is.focus.sustainDimensionSocial
is.focus.sustainDimensionEnvironmental
is.focus.systemElementMandE outcomes and impacts
is.focus.systemElementMandE performance monitoring
is.identifier.codeImpacts
is.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.07.002
is.identifier.fscdoihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34800/fsc-international502
is.identifier.schemeNameForest Stewardship Council
is.identifier.schemeTypeVoluntary Sustainability Standards
is.item.reviewStatusPeer reviewed
is.journalNameForest Policy and Economics
Download