Publication: A comparative assessment of community forest models in Cameroon and British Columbia, Canada
A comparative assessment of community forest models in Cameroon and British Columbia, Canada
| dc.contributor.author | Alemagi, D. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-01-23T18:55:46Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-01-23T18:55:46Z | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://open.fsc.org/handle/resource/650 | |
| dc.title | A comparative assessment of community forest models in Cameroon and British Columbia, Canada | en |
| dcterms.accessRights | Public | |
| dcterms.accessRights | Limited access | |
| dcterms.issued | 2010 | |
| dcterms.language | en | |
| dcterms.type | Journal Article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| fsc.evidenceCategory | FSC-relevant | |
| fsc.focus.forestType | Natural Forest | |
| fsc.focus.forestZone | Boreal | |
| fsc.focus.forestZone | Temperate | |
| fsc.focus.forestZone | Tropical | |
| fsc.focus.tenureManagement | Community | |
| fsc.focus.tenureOwnership | Community | |
| fsc.issue.social | Local communities | |
| fsc.issue.social | Indigenous peoples | |
| fsc.subject | Economic Impacts | |
| fsc.subject | Chain of custody | |
| fsc.subject | Romania | |
| fsc.subject | Europe | |
| fsc.subject | Costs of Certification | |
| fsc.topic.economic | Market access | |
| fsc.topic.political | National Forest Policy | |
| is.availability.fullText | Full text available | |
| is.coverage.country | Canada | |
| is.coverage.country | Cameroon | |
| is.coverage.countryAlpha2 | CA | |
| is.coverage.countryAlpha2 | CM | |
| is.coverage.region | North America | |
| is.coverage.region | Western Africa | |
| is.evaluation.collection | Literature review | |
| is.evaluation.collection | Interviews/surveys | |
| is.evaluation.counterfacts | No | |
| is.evaluation.notes | Little mention of forest certification in the article, main focus is on the comparison of two different community forestry models in practice. Strong legal perspective | |
| is.evaluation.quotes | "While no community forest is certified in Cameroon, only one community forest is certified in BC according to the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC). As one manager from a community-based forestry organization in BC puts it: “regarding . . . forest certification,. . .my members believe that at this point there is currently no market benefit of certification although getting involved in the process could improve some aspects of field activities, record keeping and reporting”. | |
| is.evidenceType | Synthesis paper | |
| is.evidenceType | Empirical study | |
| is.extent.number | 3 | |
| is.extent.pages | 928-936 | |
| is.extent.volume | 27 | |
| is.focus.sectors | Agriculture | |
| is.focus.sectors | Forestry | |
| is.focus.systemElement | MandE outcomes and impacts | |
| is.focus.systemElement | MandE performance monitoring | |
| is.identifier.code | Impacts | |
| is.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.12.006 | |
| is.identifier.fscdoi | http://dx.doi.org/10.34800/fsc-international532 | |
| is.item.reviewStatus | Peer reviewed | |
| is.journalName | Land Use Policy |