Does certification make a difference? Impact assessment study on FSC/SAN certification in Brazil

Author(s): Barbosa de Lima, A.C. Novaes Keppe, A.L. Maule, F. E. Sparovek, G. Corr�a Alves, M.
+ 1
Publication Year: 2009
Publication Type: Report
Source:
Code:
Access to the Study: Open link
Permanent Resource Identifier:
FSC Resource Identifier: Open link
Collections: FSC Research Portal
Abstract

Although the direct effects of certification have not proven to be significant, especially considering the hypotheses related to the FSC principles and criteria mentioned in the study, some environmental changes have been observed among the certified groups in Acre. These include the degree of instruction pertaining to the Management Plan and the Plan for Use of the Agro-Extractive Settlement Project (PAE), the conclusion of the activities foreseen in the Annual Operational Plan, waste disposal (garbage and sewage), awareness of the use of fire, measures to protect the fauna from hunting, and the degree of involvement in reports of environmental crimes. Agricultural certification also resulted in positive impacts on the coffee companies evaluated by the study. The results confirmed the importance of Socio-Environmental Certification in promoting the conservation of biodiversity and natural resources and human development in both the short and long term, fulfilling the expectations of consumers who choose to buy SAN-certified products. The results revealed that the SAN Certification generated positive impacts in relation to training and qualification; protection of Permanent Protection Areas; reforestation with native species; registration of Legal Reserves; use of less toxic pesticides and fertilizers; storage of pesticides and fertilizers; proper use of individual protection equipment; proper disposal of water, sewage and garbage; and workers' health, among others. In general, the results achieved by the study validated the impact evaluation method as an important instrument for the broader understanding of certification and for its evolution. The study also concluded that socio-environmental certification works and should be supported, and that the enterprises and the regions should always be seen in context.

Summary
Description
Citation
Barbosa de Lima, A., Keppe, A.N., Maule, F.E., Sparovek, G., Alves, M.C. and Maule, R.F., 2009. Does certification make a difference? Impact assessment study on FSC/SAN certification in Brazil. Published by Imaflora, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Access Rights: Public, Open access
Certification Body:
Version Number:
Name of the Company:
Sponsors:
License Code:
Relevance for FSC Standard Developers:
Sustainability dimension(s): Economic Environmental Social
Topics: Market Compositional diversity Forest degradation
+ 1
Subtopics: Price premium Occupational health Employment conditions
+ 1
Subject Keywords: Forests PEFC Certification
+ 8
Regions: South America
Countries: Brazil
Forest Zones: Tropical
Forest Type: Plantation
Tenure Ownership: Community
Tenure Management: Community
Evidence Category: FSC effect-related studies
Evidence Type: Case study
Evidence Subtype: Qualitative
Data Type: Company data, Interviews/surveys