Publication: Differences in forest management practices in Primorsky Krai: Case study of certified and non-certified by Forest Stewardship Council forest concessions.
Differences in forest management practices in Primorsky Krai: Case study of certified and non-certified by Forest Stewardship Council forest concessions.
| dc.contributor.author | Nikolaeva, A.S. | |
| dc.contributor.author | O'Hara, K.L. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-01-23T18:55:23Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-01-23T18:55:23Z | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://open.fsc.org/handle/resource/566 | |
| dc.title | Differences in forest management practices in Primorsky Krai: Case study of certified and non-certified by Forest Stewardship Council forest concessions. | en |
| dcterms.accessRights | Public | |
| dcterms.accessRights | Limited access | |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Nikolaeva, A. S. et al. 2019. Differences in forest management practices in Primorsky Krai: Case study of certified and non-certified by Forest Stewardship Council forest concessions. Journal of Sustainable Forestry. | en |
| dcterms.issued | 2019 | |
| dcterms.language | en | |
| dcterms.type | Journal Article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| fsc.evidenceCategory | FSC impact-related | |
| fsc.focus.forestZone | Boreal | |
| fsc.focus.sustainDimension | Environmental | |
| fsc.issue.environmental | Deforestation, tree cover loss | |
| fsc.subject | Deforestation | |
| fsc.subject | Regeneration | |
| fsc.subject | Tree cover loss | |
| fsc.topic.environmental | Regeneration | |
| is.availability.fullText | Full text available | |
| is.contributor.member | Forest Stewardship Council | |
| is.coverage.country | Russian Federation | |
| is.coverage.countryAlpha2 | RU | |
| is.coverage.region | Eastern Europe | |
| is.evaluation.counterfacts | Yes | |
| is.evaluation.findings | Mean annual percentage of tree cover loss between 2008 and 2015 was not significantly different between certified and uncertified concessions. | |
| is.evaluation.findings | Average forest cover gain over the period 2000-2012 was not significantly different between certified and uncertified concessions. | |
| is.evaluation.outcome | yes | |
| is.evaluation.significance | Statistically significant | |
| is.evidenceSubType | Empirical study - control not matched, data collected post-intervention | |
| is.evidenceType | Empirical study | |
| is.focus.sectors | Agriculture | |
| is.focus.sectors | Forestry | |
| is.focus.sustainDimension | Environmental | |
| is.focus.systemElement | MandE outcomes and impacts | |
| is.focus.systemElement | MandE performance monitoring | |
| is.identifier.code | Impacts | |
| is.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2019.1573147 | |
| is.identifier.fscdoi | http://dx.doi.org/10.34800/fsc-international555 | |
| is.identifier.schemeName | Forest Stewardship Council | |
| is.identifier.schemeType | Voluntary Sustainability Standards | |
| is.item.reviewStatus | Peer reviewed | |
| is.journalName | Journal of Sustainable Forestry |