Publication: Selective logging emissions and potential emission reductions from reduced-impact logging in the Congo Basin.
Selective logging emissions and potential emission reductions from reduced-impact logging in the Congo Basin.
dc.contributor.author | Umunay, P.M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Gopalakrishna, T. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ellis, P.W. | |
dc.contributor.author | Putz, Francis E. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-01-23T18:55:16Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-01-23T18:55:16Z | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://open.fsc.org/handle/resource/540 | |
dc.title | Selective logging emissions and potential emission reductions from reduced-impact logging in the Congo Basin. | en |
dcterms.accessRights | Public | |
dcterms.accessRights | Limited access | |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Umunay, P. M. et al. 2019. Selective logging emissions and potential emission reductions from reduced-impact logging in the Congo Basin. Forest Ecology and Management. | en |
dcterms.issued | 2019 | |
dcterms.language | en | |
dcterms.type | Journal Article | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
fsc.evidenceCategory | FSC impact-related | |
fsc.focus.forestZone | Tropical | |
fsc.focus.sustainDimension | Environmental | |
fsc.issue.environmental | Forest disturbance, forest degradation | |
fsc.subject | RIL | |
fsc.subject | Harvesting | |
fsc.subject | Carbon stock | |
fsc.subject | Carbon dioxide emissions | |
fsc.subject | Forest disturbance | |
fsc.subject | Forest degradation | |
fsc.topic.environmental | RIL | |
fsc.topic.environmental | Harvesting | |
fsc.topic.environmental | Carbon | |
is.availability.fullText | Full text available | |
is.contributor.member | Forest Stewardship Council | |
is.coverage.country | Gabon | |
is.coverage.country | Congo | |
is.coverage.country | Democratic Republic of the Congo | |
is.coverage.countryAlpha2 | GA | |
is.coverage.countryAlpha2 | CG | |
is.coverage.region | Middle Africa | |
is.evaluation.counterfacts | Yes | |
is.evaluation.findings | Total carbon emissions per cubic meter of timber harvested did not differ between FSC-certified and non-certified concessions. | |
is.evaluation.findings | As far as hauling is concerned, carbon emissions per cubic meter of timber harvested did not differ between FSC-certified and non-certified concessions. | |
is.evaluation.findings | As far as skidding is concerned, carbon emissions per cubic meter of timber harvested did not differ between FSC-certified and non-certified concessions. | |
is.evaluation.findings | As far as felling is concerned, carbon emissions per cubic meter of timber harvested did not differ between FSC-certified and non-certified concessions. | |
is.evaluation.findings | The percentage of trees felled and abandoned without any wood extraction was not different in FSC-certified and non-certified concessions. | |
is.evaluation.outcome | yes | |
is.evaluation.significance | Statistically significant | |
is.evidenceSubType | Empirical study - control not matched but some confounders taken into account - data collected post-intervention | |
is.evidenceType | Empirical study | |
is.focus.sectors | Agriculture | |
is.focus.sectors | Forestry | |
is.focus.sustainDimension | Environmental | |
is.focus.systemElement | MandE outcomes and impacts | |
is.focus.systemElement | MandE performance monitoring | |
is.identifier.code | Impacts | |
is.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.01.049 | |
is.identifier.fscdoi | http://dx.doi.org/10.34800/fsc-international576 | |
is.identifier.schemeName | Forest Stewardship Council | |
is.identifier.schemeType | Voluntary Sustainability Standards | |
is.item.reviewStatus | Peer reviewed | |
is.journalName | Forest Ecology and Management |