Publication:
Selective logging emissions and potential emission reductions from reduced-impact logging in the Congo Basin.

dc.contributor.authorUmunay, P.M.
dc.contributor.authorGopalakrishna, T.
dc.contributor.authorEllis, P.W.
dc.contributor.authorPutz, Francis E.
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-23T18:55:16Z
dc.date.available2022-01-23T18:55:16Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://open.fsc.org/handle/resource/540
dc.titleSelective logging emissions and potential emission reductions from reduced-impact logging in the Congo Basin.en
dcterms.accessRightsPublic
dcterms.accessRightsLimited access
dcterms.bibliographicCitationUmunay, P. M. et al. 2019. Selective logging emissions and potential emission reductions from reduced-impact logging in the Congo Basin. Forest Ecology and Management.en
dcterms.issued2019
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
fsc.evidenceCategoryFSC impact-related
fsc.focus.forestZoneTropical
fsc.focus.sustainDimensionEnvironmental
fsc.issue.environmentalForest disturbance, forest degradation
fsc.subjectRIL
fsc.subjectHarvesting
fsc.subjectCarbon stock
fsc.subjectCarbon dioxide emissions
fsc.subjectForest disturbance
fsc.subjectForest degradation
fsc.topic.environmentalRIL
fsc.topic.environmentalHarvesting
fsc.topic.environmentalCarbon
is.availability.fullTextFull text available
is.contributor.memberForest Stewardship Council
is.coverage.countryGabon
is.coverage.countryCongo
is.coverage.countryDemocratic Republic of the Congo
is.coverage.countryAlpha2GA
is.coverage.countryAlpha2CG
is.coverage.regionMiddle Africa
is.evaluation.counterfactsYes
is.evaluation.findingsTotal carbon emissions per cubic meter of timber harvested did not differ between FSC-certified and non-certified concessions.
is.evaluation.findingsAs far as hauling is concerned, carbon emissions per cubic meter of timber harvested did not differ between FSC-certified and non-certified concessions.
is.evaluation.findingsAs far as skidding is concerned, carbon emissions per cubic meter of timber harvested did not differ between FSC-certified and non-certified concessions.
is.evaluation.findingsAs far as felling is concerned, carbon emissions per cubic meter of timber harvested did not differ between FSC-certified and non-certified concessions.
is.evaluation.findingsThe percentage of trees felled and abandoned without any wood extraction was not different in FSC-certified and non-certified concessions.
is.evaluation.outcomeyes
is.evaluation.significanceStatistically significant
is.evidenceSubTypeEmpirical study - control not matched but some confounders taken into account - data collected post-intervention
is.evidenceTypeEmpirical study
is.focus.sectorsAgriculture
is.focus.sectorsForestry
is.focus.sustainDimensionEnvironmental
is.focus.systemElementMandE outcomes and impacts
is.focus.systemElementMandE performance monitoring
is.identifier.codeImpacts
is.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.01.049
is.identifier.fscdoihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34800/fsc-international576
is.identifier.schemeNameForest Stewardship Council
is.identifier.schemeTypeVoluntary Sustainability Standards
is.item.reviewStatusPeer reviewed
is.journalNameForest Ecology and Management
Download