Australian forest governance: A comparison of two certification schemes

Author(s): Gale, F.
Publication Year: 2014
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source: Australasian Journal of Environmental Management (21, 4, 396-412)
Code:
Access to the Study:
Permanent Resource Identifier: Open link
FSC Resource Identifier: Open link
Collections: FSC Research Portal
Abstract

Conflict over how forests should be managed has been a perennial feature of Australian environmental policy. In the early 2000s, these conflicts spilled over into a �certification war� between two international forest certification standards � the Australian Forestry Standard, championed by industry and government, and the Forest Stewardship Council, championed by environmental civil society organisations. A key issue at stake in Australia's certification war is how similar or different the two schemes are. Building on the extensive literature on �new governance�, this article undertakes a systematic comparative analysis of the two schemes utilising a three-dimensional governance framework. The comparison reveals significant differences in the political, institutional and regulatory arrangements employed by each scheme.

Summary
Sponsors
Citation
Sustainability dimension(s): 3. Social
Subject Keywords:
Regions: Oceania
Countries: Australia
Forest Zones: (not yet curated)
Forest Type: (not yet curated)
Tenure Ownership: (not yet curated)
Tenure Management: (not yet curated)
Evidence Category: FSC effect-related studies
Evidence Type: Theoretical analysis
Evidence Subtype: (not yet curated)
Data Type: (not yet curated)