Publication:
Costs Comparison between FSC and Non FSC Acacia Plantations in Quang Tri Province, Vietnam

dc.contributor.authorHoang, H.T.N.
dc.contributor.authorHoshino, S.
dc.contributor.authorHashimoto, S.
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-23T18:55:26Z
dc.date.available2022-01-23T18:55:26Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://open.fsc.org/handle/resource/576
dc.titleCosts Comparison between FSC and Non FSC Acacia Plantations in Quang Tri Province, Vietnamen
dcterms.accessRightsPublic
dcterms.accessRightsOpen access
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHoang, H. T. N., Hoshino, S. and Hashimoto, S., 'Costs comparison between FSC and non FSC acacia plantations in Quang Tri province, Vietnam.', International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 6(12), 2015, p.947.en
dcterms.issued2015
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
fsc.evidenceCategoryFSC impact-related
fsc.focus.forestZoneTropical
fsc.focus.sustainDimensionEconomic
fsc.issue.economicMarkets
fsc.issue.economicCosts, obstacles, barriers to certification
fsc.subjectFinance
fsc.subjectMarkets
fsc.subjectCosts, obstacles, barriers
fsc.subjectCertification
fsc.topic.economicPrice premium
is.availability.fullTextFull text available
is.contact.emailhai.htn@gmail.com
is.contributor.memberForest Stewardship Council
is.coverage.countryViet Nam
is.coverage.countryAlpha2VN
is.coverage.geographicLevelCountry
is.coverage.latitude14.058324
is.coverage.longitude108.277199
is.coverage.regionSouth-eastern Asia
is.evaluation.counterfactsYes
is.evaluation.dataSourceIndependent researcher data
is.evaluation.findingsTransportation fee for forest products was higher for products coming from the uncertified plantation than for those coming from the FSC-certification plantation. This was explained by the fact that the certified plantation produced round wood logs while the uncertified one produced chip wood.
is.evaluation.findingsThe price premium was 1.4 higher for FSC-certified plantation owners than for uncertified plantation owners. The Net Present Value was US$ 4,774 and US$ 3,401 for certified and uncertified plantations, respectively.
is.evaluation.outcomeyes
is.evaluation.significanceStatistically significant
is.evidenceResourceTypePrimary
is.evidenceSubTypeEmpirical study - with matched control, data collected post-intervention
is.evidenceSummaryThis paper provides a cost comparison between FSC certified and non-certified Acacia plantations in Vietnam, advising apparent price premiums to be viewed with caution due to the current subsidisation aimed at increasing local participation.
is.evidenceTypeEmpirical study
is.extent.number12
is.extent.pages947-951
is.extent.volume6
is.focus.productsTimber products
is.focus.sdgSDG 12 - Responsible Production and Consumption
is.focus.sectorsAgriculture
is.focus.sectorsForestry
is.focus.sustainDimensionEconomic
is.focus.sustainIssueParticipant costs and benefits
is.focus.sustainLensFinance
is.focus.sustainOutcomePrice premiums
is.focus.systemElementMandE outcomes and impacts
is.focus.systemElementMandE performance monitoring
is.identifier.codeImpacts
is.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.7763/ijesd.2015.v6.727
is.identifier.fscdoihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34800/fsc-international680
is.identifier.schemeNameForest Stewardship Council
is.identifier.schemeTypeVoluntary Sustainability Standards
is.item.reviewStatusPeer reviewed
is.journalNameInternational Journal of Environmental Science and Development
Download