Publication:
The effectiveness of market-based conservation: can forest certification compensate for poor environmental regulation in the tropics?

dc.contributor.authorEbeling, J.
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-23T18:55:53Z
dc.date.available2022-01-23T18:55:53Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://open.fsc.org/handle/resource/674
dc.titleThe effectiveness of market-based conservation: can forest certification compensate for poor environmental regulation in the tropics?en
dcterms.accessRightsPublic
dcterms.accessRightsOpen access
dcterms.issued2005
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.publisher2005 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change "International Organisations and Global Environmental Governance"
dcterms.typeConference Paper
dspace.entity.typePublication
fsc.evidenceCategoryFSC impact-related
fsc.focus.forestZoneTropical
fsc.focus.sustainDimensionPolitical, legal, systemic
fsc.issue.economicBenefits, motivations, reasons for certification
fsc.issue.economicCosts, obstacles, barriers to certification
fsc.issue.environmentalIntact Forest Landscapes
fsc.subjectForests
fsc.subjectCertification
fsc.topic.economicMarket access
fsc.topic.politicalGovernance
is.availability.fullTextFull text available
is.contributor.memberForest Stewardship Council
is.coverage.countryEcuador
is.coverage.countryBolivia
is.coverage.countryAlpha2EC
is.coverage.countryAlpha2BO
is.coverage.regionSouth America
is.evaluation.collectionInterviews/surveys
is.evaluation.counterfactsNo
is.evaluation.notesThe paper examines FSC certification as an example for market-based environmental regulation. Due to the fact that FSC certification still concentrates on the global North, the author tries to identify the obstacles FSC faces in the Global South. Therefore case studies based on interviews from Ecuador and Bolivia were evaluated. It is figured out that policy-related factors are crucial for the success of forest certification, while the market provides the economic incentives. First of all the cost of certification, when sustainable forestry practices are adopted, determine the acceptance of certification. But high requirements of environmental laws influence these costs. The author concludes that the influence of government policies shouldn't be neglected, because their influence and support is decisive for the support of the certification system, so that a public-private governance is needed.
is.evaluation.quotesThe situation in Ecuador and Bolivia provides strong evidence for the hypothesis that forest certification cannot compensate for poor environmental law enforcement.
is.evaluation.quotesCertification can complement environmental laws and provide important incentives to comply with them. If specific conditions are in place, certification can thrive even in the difficult socio-political environment of tropical countries.
is.evaluation.quotesCertification offers market benefits for important producers and the synergies that arise from government policy and market incentives together can jointly create conditions in which it becomes economically rational to practice sustainable forest management – and to comply with environmental laws.
is.focus.sectorsAgriculture
is.focus.sectorsForestry
is.focus.systemElementMandE outcomes and impacts
is.focus.systemElementMandE performance monitoring
is.identifier.codeImpacts
is.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34800/fsc-international746
is.identifier.schemeNameForest Stewardship Council
is.identifier.schemeTypeVoluntary Sustainability Standards
is.link.urlhttp://userpage.fu-berlin.de/ffu/akumwelt/bc2005/papers/ebeling_bc2005.pdf
Download