Publication: Stand Structure of Hemiboreal Old-Growth Forests - Characteristic Features, Variation Among Site Types, and a Comparison with FSC-Certified Mature Stands in Estonia
Stand Structure of Hemiboreal Old-Growth Forests - Characteristic Features, Variation Among Site Types, and a Comparison with FSC-Certified Mature Stands in Estonia
dc.contributor.author | Lohmus, A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kraut, Ann | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-01-23T18:55:55Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-01-23T18:55:55Z | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://open.fsc.org/handle/resource/678 | |
dc.title | Stand Structure of Hemiboreal Old-Growth Forests - Characteristic Features, Variation Among Site Types, and a Comparison with FSC-Certified Mature Stands in Estonia | en |
dcterms.accessRights | Public | |
dcterms.accessRights | Limited access | |
dcterms.issued | 2010 | |
dcterms.language | en | |
dcterms.type | Journal Article | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
fsc.evidenceCategory | FSC impact-related | |
fsc.focus.forestType | Natural Forest | |
fsc.focus.forestZone | Temperate | |
fsc.focus.sustainDimension | Environmental | |
fsc.issue.environmental | Biodiversity | |
fsc.subject | Forests | |
fsc.subject | Certification | |
is.availability.fullText | Full text available | |
is.contributor.member | Forest Stewardship Council | |
is.coverage.country | Estonia | |
is.coverage.countryAlpha2 | EE | |
is.coverage.region | Europe | |
is.evaluation.collection | Case studies | |
is.evaluation.counterfacts | Yes | |
is.evaluation.quotes | Landscapes should include not only reserves but also sustainably managed commercial forestswhere old-growth features are maintained, enhanced and restoredthrough silvicultural practices (Hansen et al., 1991; Lindenmayerand Franklin, 2002). | |
is.evaluation.quotes | In the framework of certification, mature commercial stands canbe managed in a way to provide many functional characteristicsof old growth. The main problem in the FSC-certified, mostlynaturally regenerated, commercial stands in Estonia is the lackof very large trees, particularly of late-successional deciduousspecies. That problem should be addressed both by improvingsilvicultural techniques (retention cutting, salvage logging) andindicators set by the national FSC-standard. | |
is.evidenceType | Empirical study | |
is.extent.pages | 155-165 | |
is.extent.volume | 260 | |
is.focus.sectors | Agriculture | |
is.focus.sectors | Forestry | |
is.focus.sustainDimension | Environmental | |
is.focus.systemElement | MandE outcomes and impacts | |
is.focus.systemElement | MandE performance monitoring | |
is.identifier.code | Impacts | |
is.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.04.018 | |
is.identifier.fscdoi | http://dx.doi.org/10.34800/fsc-international756 | |
is.identifier.schemeName | Forest Stewardship Council | |
is.identifier.schemeType | Voluntary Sustainability Standards | |
is.item.reviewStatus | Peer reviewed | |
is.journalName | Forest Ecology and Management |