Publication: Ecological effects of clearcutting practices in a boreal forest (Arkhangelsk Region, Russian Federation) both with and without FSC certification.
Ecological effects of clearcutting practices in a boreal forest (Arkhangelsk Region, Russian Federation) both with and without FSC certification.
| dc.contributor.author | Blumroeder, J.S. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Winter, S. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Goroncy, A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hobson, Peter R. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shegolev, A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dobrynin, D. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Amosova, I. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ilina, O. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Parinova, T. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Volkov, A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Graebener, U.F. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-01-23T18:55:22Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-01-23T18:55:22Z | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://open.fsc.org/handle/resource/564 | |
| dc.title | Ecological effects of clearcutting practices in a boreal forest (Arkhangelsk Region, Russian Federation) both with and without FSC certification. | en |
| dcterms.accessRights | Public | |
| dcterms.accessRights | Limited access | |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Blumroeder, J. S. et al. 2019. Ecological effects of clearcutting practices in a boreal forest (Arkhangelsk Region, Russian Federation) both with and without FSC certification. Ecological Indicators. | en |
| dcterms.issued | 2019 | |
| dcterms.language | en | |
| dcterms.type | Journal Article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| fsc.evidenceCategory | FSC impact-related | |
| fsc.focus.forestZone | Boreal | |
| fsc.focus.sustainDimension | Environmental | |
| fsc.issue.environmental | Conservation | |
| fsc.issue.environmental | Forest disturbance, forest degradation | |
| fsc.subject | Conservation | |
| fsc.subject | Forest disturbance | |
| fsc.subject | Forest degradation | |
| fsc.topic.environmental | Plant Biodiversity | |
| fsc.topic.environmental | Dead wood | |
| fsc.topic.environmental | Coarse wood debris | |
| fsc.topic.environmental | Ecosystem processes | |
| is.availability.fullText | Full text available | |
| is.contributor.member | Forest Stewardship Council | |
| is.coverage.country | Russian Federation | |
| is.coverage.countryAlpha2 | RU | |
| is.coverage.latitude | -9.166896 | |
| is.coverage.longitude | 39.086718 | |
| is.coverage.region | Eastern Europe | |
| is.evaluation.counterfacts | Yes | |
| is.evaluation.findings | The relative density of one tree species (Populus tremula) in clearcuts was different in FSC-certified and uncertified forests | |
| is.evaluation.findings | Plant species richness was higher in clearcuts in FSC-certified concessions than in clearcuts in uncertified forests | |
| is.evaluation.findings | The diversity of herbaceous vegetation in clearcuts was higher in FSC-certified concessions than in clearcuts in uncertified forests. | |
| is.evaluation.findings | The diversity of herbaceous vegetation (except epiphytes) in clearcuts was higher in clearcuts in FSC-certified concessions than in clearcuts in uncertified forests. | |
| is.evaluation.findings | The relative density of one species (Populus tremula) in clearcuts was similar in FSC-certified and reference forests. | |
| is.evaluation.findings | Plant species richness was as high in clearcuts in FSC-certified concessions as in reference forests. | |
| is.evaluation.findings | The diversity of herbaceous vegetation in clearcuts was similar in FSC-certified concessions and reference forests. | |
| is.evaluation.findings | The diversity of herbaceous vegetation (except epiphytes) in clearcuts was similar in FSC-certified concessions and reference forests. | |
| is.evaluation.findings | The diversity of epiphytes vegetation was similar in clearcuts in FSC-certified and in uncertified forests. | |
| is.evaluation.findings | The density of early regenerating trees from one species (Populus tremula) in clearcuts was different in FSC-certified and uncertified forests. | |
| is.evaluation.findings | The density of regenerating trees from three local species in clearcuts was similar in FSC-certified and uncertified forests. | |
| is.evaluation.findings | The relative density of three local tree species in the regenerating vegetation in clearcuts was similar in FSC-certified and uncertified forests. | |
| is.evaluation.findings | The mean volume of standing deadwood in clearcuts was lower in FSC-certified than in reference forests. | |
| is.evaluation.findings | The mean volume of standing deadwood in clearcuts was not different between FSC-certified and uncertified forests. | |
| is.evaluation.findings | The volume of fresh lying deadwood in clearcuts was equally high in the FSC-certified and reference forests. | |
| is.evaluation.findings | The volume of fresh lying deadwood in clearcuts was higher in the FSC-certified than in the uncertified forests. | |
| is.evaluation.findings | The average total amount of all types of deadwood left in clearcuts were similar in the FSC-certified and uncertified forests. | |
| is.evaluation.findings | The mean volume of living tree biomass retained in clearcuts was not different between FSC-certified and uncertified forests. | |
| is.evaluation.findings | The average of temperature-related variables was higher in clearcuts found in FSC-certified (i.e. hotter) than in reference forests. | |
| is.evaluation.findings | The average of temperature-related variables in clearcuts was similar in FSC-certified and uncertified forests. | |
| is.evaluation.findings | The density of early regenerating trees from one species (Populus tremula) in clearcuts was similar in FSC-certified and reference forests. | |
| is.evaluation.outcome | yes | |
| is.evaluation.significance | Statistically significant | |
| is.evidenceSubType | Empirical study - control not matched but some confounders taken into account - data collected post-intervention | |
| is.evidenceType | Empirical study | |
| is.focus.sectors | Agriculture | |
| is.focus.sectors | Forestry | |
| is.focus.sustainDimension | Environmental | |
| is.focus.systemElement | MandE outcomes and impacts | |
| is.focus.systemElement | MandE performance monitoring | |
| is.identifier.code | Impacts | |
| is.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105461 | |
| is.identifier.fscdoi | http://dx.doi.org/10.34800/fsc-international776 | |
| is.identifier.schemeName | Forest Stewardship Council | |
| is.identifier.schemeType | Voluntary Sustainability Standards | |
| is.item.reviewStatus | Peer reviewed | |
| is.journalName | Ecological Indicators |