Publication:
Conservation gains through HCVF assessments in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Romania

dc.contributor.authorIoras, F.
dc.contributor.authorAbrudan, I.V.
dc.contributor.authorDautbasic, M.
dc.contributor.authorAvdibegović, M.
dc.contributor.authorGurean, D.
dc.contributor.authorRatnasingam, J.
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-23T18:57:30Z
dc.date.available2022-01-23T18:57:30Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://open.fsc.org/handle/resource/942
dc.titleConservation gains through HCVF assessments in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Romaniaen
dcterms.abstractThis paper analyses the conservation gains through High Conservation Value Forest (HCVF) assessments in two South-East European countries (Bosnia-Herzegovina and Romania). These are based on the review of the Draft Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) National Standards and HCVF Manuals and the results of the certification process of seven forest management units in the two countries. The review indicates that the application of Principle 9 (High Conservation Value Forests) and Criterion 6.4 of the FSC in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Romania was influenced by the size and nature of tenure (i.e., public or non-public land), rather than geographic location per se. The study also revealed that the assessment of HCVF has, for the first time, raised the question of conservation of cultural, historical and religious values as well as the sustainable management of those forests relevant for the basic needs of communities. These are values not currently covered at the present by the national conservation legislation in either of these two countries. Findings of this study in both countries demonstrates that there are certain conservation gains as a result of the HCVF assessment, especially related to ecosystem services, prevention of soil erosion and conservation of threatened, endangered and endemic species.en
dcterms.accessRightsPublic
dcterms.accessRightsOpen access
dcterms.bibliographicCitationIoras, F., brudan, I.V., Dautbasic, M., Avdibegovic, M., Gurean, D., Ratnasingam, J., 2009. Conservation gains through HCVF assessments in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Romania. Biodiversity and conservation, 18(13), pp.3395-3406.en
dcterms.issued2009
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.licenseCopyrighted; all rights reserveden
dcterms.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
is.availability.fullTextFull text available
is.contributor.funderTypePublic funds (government, EU funding, public research grants)
is.coverage.countryBosnia and Herzegovina
is.coverage.countryRomania
is.coverage.geographicLevelCountry
is.coverage.latitude43.915886
is.coverage.latitude45.943161
is.coverage.longitude17.679076
is.coverage.longitude24.96676
is.coverage.regionEurope
is.evaluation.collectionCompany/certified entities /co-op data records
is.evaluation.dataSourceIntergovernmental data (World Bank, UN, FAO data)
is.evidenceSubTypeSynthesis paper - literature review
is.evidenceTypeSynthesis paper
is.focus.productsForestry products
is.focus.sdgSDG 15 - Life on Land
is.focus.sdgSDG 12 - Responsible Production and Consumption
is.focus.sectorsForestry
is.focus.sustainDimensionEnvironmental
is.focus.sustainIssueForests and other ecosystems
is.focus.sustainIssuePlant and wildlife conservation
is.focus.sustainIssuePesticides, fertilizers and soil
is.focus.sustainLensJurisdictional approaches
is.focus.sustainOutcomeDeforestation and forest protection
is.focus.sustainOutcomeEcosystem quality
is.focus.sustainOutcomeSoil erosion
is.focus.sustainOutcomeRare, threatened and endangered species
is.focus.systemElementMandE outcomes and impacts
is.focus.systemElementMandE performance monitoring
is.identifier.codeImpacts
is.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9649-8
is.identifier.fscdoihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34800/fsc-international825
is.identifier.schemeTypeVoluntary Sustainability Standards
is.item.reviewStatusPeer reviewed
is.journalNameBiodiversity and Conservation
Download