Publication:
Sustainable Forestry in Sweden: The Effect of Competition Among Private Certification Schemes

dc.contributor.authorGulbrandsen, L.H.
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-23T18:56:31Z
dc.date.available2022-01-23T18:56:31Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://open.fsc.org/handle/resource/786
dc.titleSustainable Forestry in Sweden: The Effect of Competition Among Private Certification Schemesen
dcterms.accessRightsPublic
dcterms.accessRightsLimited access
dcterms.issued2005
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
fsc.evidenceCategoryFSC impact-related
fsc.focus.forestTypeNatural Forest
fsc.focus.sustainDimensionPolitical, legal, systemic
fsc.focus.sustainDimensionEnvironmental
fsc.issue.environmentalEnvironmental management
fsc.subjectCertified Communities
fsc.subjectForests
fsc.subjectCertification
fsc.subjectIndonesia
fsc.subjectChallenges
fsc.subjectProcesses
fsc.subjectLessons Learned
fsc.subjectCommunity Forestry
fsc.topic.politicalGovernance
is.availability.fullTextFull text available
is.contributor.memberForest Stewardship Council
is.coverage.countrySweden
is.coverage.countryAlpha2SE
is.coverage.regionEurope
is.evaluation.collectionInterviews/surveys
is.evaluation.collectionLiterature review
is.evaluation.counterfactsNo
is.evaluation.quotesThe data for this study were obtained through interviews with key persons in the Swedish forest certification processes, including environmental organizations, forestry interest organizations, forest companies, and government agencies. In addition, I carried out a document study (i.e., certification standards, public policy documents, press releases, and newspaper articles) and reviewed other studies of forest certification and forest politics in Sweden and elsewhere.
is.evaluation.quotesIt is interesting that competition between non–state authorities may help resolve standardization dilemmas and balance different standard- setting ideals. Rather than a “race to the top” or a “race to the bottom,” the FSC and PEFC rivalry in Sweden has resulted in some cross fertilization and convergence of the two schemes. The FSC has responded by adjusting rules to better accommodate the needs of business; the PEFC has changed upward in an effort to boost credibility in the marketplace. These dynamics have been observed not only in Sweden but in a number of developed countries such as Germany, the United Kingdom, Canada, and the United States (Cashore et al., 2004).
is.evidenceTypeSynthesis paper
is.evidenceTypeBriefing or opinion
is.extent.number3
is.extent.pages338-355
is.extent.volume14
is.focus.sectorsAgriculture
is.focus.sectorsForestry
is.focus.sustainDimensionEnvironmental
is.focus.systemElementMandE outcomes and impacts
is.focus.systemElementMandE performance monitoring
is.identifier.codeImpacts
is.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/1070496505280061
is.identifier.fscdoihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34800/fsc-international846
is.identifier.schemeNameForest Stewardship Council
is.identifier.schemeNameProgramme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification
is.identifier.schemeTypeVoluntary Sustainability Standards
is.item.reviewStatusPeer reviewed
is.journalNameJournal of Environment and Development
Download