Publication: Distinguishing community forest products in the market. Industrial demand for a mechanism that brings together forest certification and fair trade
Distinguishing community forest products in the market. Industrial demand for a mechanism that brings together forest certification and fair trade
dc.contributor.author | Macqueen, D. | |
dc.contributor.author | Dufey, A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Gomes, A.P.C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Nouer, M.R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Suárez, L.A.A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Subendranathan, V. | |
dc.contributor.author | Trujillo, Z.H.G. | |
dc.contributor.author | Vermeulen, S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Voivodic, M. de A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Wilson, E. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-01-23T18:56:15Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-01-23T18:56:15Z | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://open.fsc.org/handle/resource/740 | |
dc.title | Distinguishing community forest products in the market. Industrial demand for a mechanism that brings together forest certification and fair trade | en |
dcterms.abstract | This report assesses demand for a mechanism that brings together forest certification and fair trade in the timber market. Timber buyers from 21 countries were surveyed as part of this study - with more detailed value chain analysis in 4 country case studies. The report concludes that there is indeed both demand and practical options to do more for community forest producers. A historic opportunity exists to bring together forest certification and fair trade in the interests both of communities and the forests on which they depend. | en |
dcterms.accessRights | Public | |
dcterms.accessRights | Open access | |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Macqueen, D., Dufey, A., Gomes, A.P.C., Nouer, M.R., Suárez, L.A.A., Subendranathan, V., Trujillo, Z.H.G., Vermeulen, S., Voivodic, M. de A. and Wilson, E. (2008) Distinguishing community forest products in the market: Industrial demand for a mechanism that brings together forest certification and fair trade. IIED Small and Medium Forestry Enterprise Series No. 22. | en |
dcterms.issued | 2008 | |
dcterms.language | en | |
dcterms.license | Copyrighted; all rights reserved | en |
dcterms.publisher | International Institute for Environment and Development | |
dcterms.type | Report | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
fsc.evidenceCategory | FSC impact-related | |
fsc.focus.sustainDimension | Economic | |
fsc.focus.sustainDimension | Social | |
fsc.focus.tenureManagement | Community | |
fsc.focus.tenureOwnership | Community | |
fsc.issue.social | Local communities | |
fsc.issue.social | Indigenous peoples | |
fsc.subject | Forests | |
fsc.subject | Certification | |
fsc.topic.economic | Market access | |
fsc.topic.political | Empowerment | |
fsc.topic.social | Local communities | |
fsc.topic.social | Indigenous peoples | |
fsc.topic.social | Livelihoods | |
fsc.topic.social | Consultation, participation, empowerment | |
is.availability.fullText | Full text available | |
is.contributor.funderType | Private funds (NGOs, companies, VSS self-funded etc) | |
is.contributor.member | Forest Stewardship Council | |
is.coverage.country | Mexico | |
is.coverage.country | Brazil | |
is.coverage.country | Guatemala | |
is.coverage.country | Papua New Guinea | |
is.coverage.countryAlpha2 | MX | |
is.coverage.countryAlpha2 | BR | |
is.coverage.countryAlpha2 | GT | |
is.coverage.countryAlpha2 | PG | |
is.coverage.geographicLevel | Country | |
is.coverage.latitude | -102.552784 | |
is.coverage.latitude | -51.92528 | |
is.coverage.latitude | -90.230759 | |
is.coverage.latitude | -6.314993 | |
is.coverage.longitude | 23.634501 | |
is.coverage.longitude | -14.235004 | |
is.coverage.longitude | 15.783471 | |
is.coverage.longitude | 143.95555 | |
is.evaluation.collection | Interviews/surveys with certified entities and their representatives and workers/producers | |
is.evaluation.counterfacts | No | |
is.evaluation.dataSource | Private company data | |
is.evaluation.notes | Based on an international survey on demand for certified responsible community timber products and case studies, the report explores the industrial interest in a distinction of sustainable and fair community forest products in regard to poverty reduction as an ultimate goal. Considerable interest of international leading timber buyers was found to develop a mechanism that allows distinction. The interest in participating in a pilot scheme was found on different steps of the supply chain, especially as a possibility to have an advantage towards competitors. Additionally, a restriction on the already existing FSC and fair trade labels were desired because of the consumer awareness of these schemes. The case studies of successful examples of a trade directly between communities and international companies show what is realistic and what is necessary for further implementation. | |
is.evaluation.quotes | Recent analyses suggest that it is small enterprises, especially those democratically managed by communities, which address the broader dimension of poverty. They accrue wealth locally and secure local forest access | |
is.evaluation.quotes | Practical examples of successful trade with communities throw useful light on two critical prerequisites for success. The formation of strong community business organisations is one. The need to develop community forest management and business capacity over time in a stepwise manner is a second. The experience of the fair trade movement in addressing these issuesmakes it logical to build better links between forestry and fair trade. | |
is.evaluation.quotes | The main conclusion is that there does seem to be significant demand for a mechanism to credibly distinguish community forest products in the market. This demand comes both from international and national buyers groups and from community forest producers themselves. | |
is.evidenceSubType | Descriptive information - contextual and operational | |
is.evidenceType | Descriptive information | |
is.focus.products | Forestry products | |
is.focus.sdg | SDG 15 - Life on Land | |
is.focus.sectors | Agriculture | |
is.focus.sectors | Forestry | |
is.focus.sustainDimension | Economic | |
is.focus.sustainDimension | Social | |
is.focus.sustainIssue | Rights of indigenous peoples and local communities | |
is.focus.sustainIssue | Consumers and supply chains | |
is.focus.sustainIssue | Participant costs and benefits | |
is.focus.sustainLens | Cooperatives | |
is.focus.sustainLens | Indigenous peoples | |
is.focus.sustainLens | Pro-poor development | |
is.focus.sustainOutcome | Community development and infrastructure | |
is.focus.sustainOutcome | Governance mechanisms | |
is.focus.sustainOutcome | Consumer preferences | |
is.focus.sustainOutcome | Sustainable sourcing | |
is.focus.sustainOutcome | Price premiums | |
is.focus.sustainOutcome | Market access | |
is.focus.systemElement | MandE outcomes and impacts | |
is.focus.systemElement | MandE performance monitoring | |
is.identifier.code | Impacts | |
is.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.34800/fsc-international858 | |
is.identifier.schemeName | Forest Stewardship Council | |
is.identifier.schemeType | Voluntary Sustainability Standards | |
is.link.url | http://webdoc.sub.gwdg.de/ebook/mon/2010/ppn%20631004920.pdf |