Publication: Impacts of nonstate, market-driven governance on Chilean forests
Impacts of nonstate, market-driven governance on Chilean forests
| dc.contributor.author | Heilmayr, R. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lambin, Eric F. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-01-23T18:55:14Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-01-23T18:55:14Z | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://open.fsc.org/handle/resource/534 | |
| dc.language | en | |
| dc.rights | Public | |
| dc.rights | Open access | |
| dc.title | Impacts of nonstate, market-driven governance on Chilean forests | en |
| dcterms.abstract | Global markets for agricultural products, timber, and minerals are critically important drivers of deforestation. The supply chains driving land use change may also provide opportunities to halt deforestation. Market campaigns, moratoria, and certification schemes have been promoted as powerful tools to achieve conservation goals. Despite their promise, there have been few opportunities to rigorously quantify the ability of these non-state, market-driven (NSMD) governance regimes to deliver conservation outcomes. This study analyzes the impacts of three NSMD governance systems that sought to end the conversion of natural forests to plantations in Chile at the start of the 21st century. Using a multilevel, panel dataset of land use changes in Chile, we identify the impact of participation within each of the governance regimes by implementing a series of matched difference-in-differences analyses. Taking advantage of the mosaic of different NSMD regimes adopted in Chile, we explore the relative effectiveness of different policies. NSMD governance regimes reduced deforestation on participating properties by 2-23%. The NSMD governance regimes we studied included collaborative and confrontational strategies between environmental and industry stakeholders. We find that the more collaborative governance systems studied achieved better environmental performance than more confrontational approaches. Whereas many government conservation programs have targeted regions with little likelihood of conversion, we demonstrate that NSMD governance has the potential to alter behavior on high-deforestation properties. Resource freely available online through the PNAS open access option. Abstract obtained with permission, to access the full article click here: www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1600394113 | en |
| dcterms.accessRights | Public | |
| dcterms.accessRights | Open access | |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Heilmayr, R., and E. F. Lambin. 'Impacts of Nonstate Governance on Chilean Forests'. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 113, no. 11, 2016, pp. 2910-2915 | en |
| dcterms.issued | 2016 | |
| dcterms.other | Heilmayr, R., and E. F. Lambin. 'Impacts of Nonstate Governance on Chilean Forests'. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 113, no. 11, 2016, pp. 2910-2915 | |
| dcterms.type | Journal Article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| fsc.evidenceCategory | FSC effect-related studies | |
| fsc.focus.forestType | (not yet curated) | |
| fsc.focus.forestZone | Tropical | |
| fsc.focus.sustainDimension | Environmental | |
| fsc.focus.sustainDimension | Social | |
| fsc.focus.tenureManagement | (not yet curated) | |
| fsc.focus.tenureOwnership | (not yet curated) | |
| fsc.issue.environmental | Forest loss | |
| fsc.subject | Deforestation | |
| fsc.subject | Ecosystem | |
| fsc.subject | Tree cover loss | |
| fsc.subject | Spillover | |
| fsc.topic.environmental | Forest cover | |
| fsc.topic.environmental | Governance | |
| is.availability.fullText | Full text available | |
| is.contributor.funderType | Mixed | |
| is.contributor.member | Forest Stewardship Council | |
| is.coverage.country | Chile | |
| is.coverage.countryAlpha2 | CL | |
| is.coverage.geographicLevel | Country | |
| is.coverage.latitude | -37.73070989 | |
| is.coverage.longitude | -71.38256213 | |
| is.coverage.region | South America | |
| is.evaluation.collection | Remote sensing | |
| is.evaluation.comparison | Treatment vs Control | |
| is.evaluation.counterfacts | Yes | |
| is.evaluation.dataSource | Independent researcher data | |
| is.evaluation.significance | Statistically significant | |
| is.evidenceResourceType | Primary | |
| is.evidenceSubType | Data collected before and after intervention | |
| is.evidenceType | Comparative study with matched control | |
| is.focus.products | Forestry products | |
| is.focus.sdg | SDG 15 - Life on Land | |
| is.focus.sectors | Agriculture | |
| is.focus.sectors | Forestry | |
| is.focus.sustainDimension | Environmental | |
| is.focus.sustainIssue | Forests and other ecosystems | |
| is.focus.sustainLens | Ecosystem | |
| is.focus.sustainOutcome | Deforestation and forest protection | |
| is.focus.systemElement | MandE outcomes and impacts | |
| is.focus.systemElement | MandE performance monitoring | |
| is.identifier.code | Impacts | |
| is.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1600394113 | |
| is.identifier.fscdoi | http://dx.doi.org/10.34800/fsc-international884 | |
| is.identifier.schemeName | Chilean Sustainable Forest Management Certification System | |
| is.identifier.schemeName | Forest Stewardship Council | |
| is.identifier.schemeName | Joint Solutions Project | |
| is.identifier.schemeType | Bans, moratoria, and multi-party agreements (for specific commodities/areas) | |
| is.identifier.schemeType | Voluntary Sustainability Standards | |
| is.item.reviewStatus | Peer reviewed | |
| is.journalName | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America |