Monitoring the impact of certification

Date
Submission date
Authors
Longh, H.
Persoon, G.
Type
Journal Article
Version number
Status

In spite of extensive sustainability indicators, there is a lack of quantitative evidence of the positive impact of certification on forest biodiversity. The widespread use of conventional monitoring approaches have thus far not provided conclusive information about the effects of forest certification schemes such as that of the Forest Certification Council (FSC). One of the reasons for this is thought to be the high costs of conventional monitoring (and consequently the relatively small sample sizes), which does not permit representative sampling (van der Hoeven et al. 2000; van Kuijk, Putz and Zagt 2009).

Subject Keywords
Forests, Cork, Oak, Certification, Forest management, FSC, Freshwater Habitats, Rapid Bio-assessment Protocol, Riparian Vegetation, Stream Visual Assessment Protocol
Sponsors
Description
Identifiers
Forest Type
Natural Forest
Plantation
Forest Zone
Tropical
Code
Effective date
Review year
Alternative Strategy
Alternative Type
Pest Type
Alternative Trial
Coverage Country
Method
Active Ingredient