Reconciling certification and intact forest landscape conservation

View/Open
Date
Submission date
Authors
Kleinschroth, F.
Garcia, C.
Ghazoul, J.
Type
Journal Article
Version number
Status

In 2014, the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) added a new criterion to its principles that requires protection of intact forest landscapes (IFLs). An IFL is an extensive area of forest that lacks roads and other signs of human activity as detected through remote sensing. In the Congo basin, our analysis of road networks in formally approved concessionary logging areas revealed greater loss of IFL in certified than in noncertified concessions. In areas of informal (i.e., nonregulated) extraction, road networks are known to be less detectable by remote sensing. Under the current definition of IFL, companies certified under FSC standards are likely to be penalized relative to the noncertified as well as the informal logging sector on account of their planned road networks, despite an otherwise better standard of forest management. This could ultimately undermine certification and its wider adoption, with implications for the future of sustainable forest management.

Subject Keywords
Forests, Wildfires, Protected areas, Certification, Tropics, Guatemala, Maya Biosphere Reserve, Natural forest, Deforestation, Comparison
Sponsors
Description
Identifiers
Forest Type
Natural Forest
Forest Zone
Tropical
Code
Effective date
Review year
Alternative Strategy
Alternative Type
Pest Type
Alternative Trial
Coverage Country
Congo
Method
Active Ingredient
Collections