Publication:
The United States' Race to Certify Sustainable Forestry: Non-State Environmental Governance and the Competition for Policy-Making Authority

dc.contributor.authorCashore, B.
dc.contributor.authorAuld, G.
dc.contributor.authorNewsom, D.
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-23T18:56:39Z
dc.date.available2022-01-23T18:56:39Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://open.fsc.org/handle/resource/809
dc.titleThe United States' Race to Certify Sustainable Forestry: Non-State Environmental Governance and the Competition for Policy-Making Authorityen
dcterms.accessRightsPublic
dcterms.accessRightsLimited access
dcterms.issued2003
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
fsc.evidenceCategoryFSC impact-related
fsc.focus.sustainDimensionPolitical, legal, systemic
fsc.subjectForests
fsc.subjectCertification
fsc.topic.politicalGovernance
fsc.topic.politicalNon-State Market Regulation
fsc.topic.politicalSpillover
is.availability.fullTextFull text available
is.contributor.memberForest Stewardship Council
is.coverage.countryUnited States of America
is.coverage.countryAlpha2US
is.coverage.regionNorth America
is.evaluation.collectionLiterature review
is.evaluation.counterfactsNo
is.evaluation.notesThe key issue is not simply whether firms will support these certification systems, but which ones they will support – ones initiated by industry that tend to be more flexible and give greater voice to industry actors, or ones in which environmental and social groups had a great role in designing their procedures and policies. And understanding whether and how these systems might address matters of concern to global civil society means tracing this competition and the certification standards that emerge (Cashore et al., 2004). The purpose of this paper is to systematically assess the nature of this competition in the US forest sector. We choose forestry because it is arguably the most advanced case of forest certification globally.'
is.evaluation.quotesThese “non-state market driven” governance regimes (Cashore, 2002) locate their authority not from the state, but from the domestic and global marketplace.
is.evaluation.quotesthe influence of the FSC on sustainable forest management is not simply through its own rule development, but also on the impact it has had on the way competing programs develop their decision making processes and their procedural and substantive rules.
is.evaluation.quotesA key finding of this project is that the competition for “legitimacy” does not just affect which certification program comes to be accepted by forest companies and landowners, but also the way each program changes from its original conception in order to earn broader support along the market's supply chain.
is.evaluation.quotesthe FSC already appears to face different challenges in keeping its core membership satisfied as it attempts a variety of conforming techniques to become more than a niche player for the US certification market.
is.evidenceSubTypeDescriptive information - theoretical studies or conceptual explorations
is.evidenceTypeDescriptive information
is.extent.number3
is.extent.volume5
is.focus.sectorsAgriculture
is.focus.sectorsForestry
is.focus.systemElementMandE outcomes and impacts
is.focus.systemElementMandE performance monitoring
is.identifier.codeImpacts
is.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.2202/1469-3569.1076
is.identifier.fscdoihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34800/fsc-international313
is.identifier.schemeNameForest Stewardship Council
is.identifier.schemeNameSustainable Forestry Initiative
is.identifier.schemeTypeVoluntary Sustainability Standards
is.item.reviewStatusPeer reviewed
is.journalNameBusiness and Politics
Download