Publication:
Policy matters: certification and biodiversity: how voluntary certification standards impact biodiversity and human livelihoods

dc.contributor.authorCastka, P.
dc.contributor.authorLeaman, D. J.
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-23T18:57:05Z
dc.date.available2022-01-23T18:57:05Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://open.fsc.org/handle/resource/879
dc.titlePolicy matters: certification and biodiversity: how voluntary certification standards impact biodiversity and human livelihoodsen
dcterms.abstractThis issue of Policy Matters provides insights for policy makers, NGOs, certification organizations, the private sector, and the general public about the impacts of voluntary certification standards (VCS) on biodiversity and human livelihoods. In line with IUCN's vision of "a just world that values and conserves nature" contributions specifically address the role of voluntary certification in conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity as it is defined in the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity1 . The overall aim of this issue is to describe and evaluate key elements of VCS that protect and enhance biodiversity and human livelihoods. The term "Voluntary Certification Standards" includes their principles, criteria, and indicators as well as implementation mechanisms such as assurance systems and chain of custody. Adoption of the VCS principles and criteria can include incorporation into a company's own standards or integration with national regulatory systems, particularly where third-party certification is difficult.en
dcterms.accessRightsPublic
dcterms.accessRightsOpen access
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCastka, P., 2021. Policy matters: certification and biodiversity: how voluntary certification standards impact biodiversity and human livelihoodsen
dcterms.issued2016
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.licenseCopyrighted; all rights reserveden
dcterms.publisherInternational Union for Conservation of Nature
dcterms.typeReport
dspace.entity.typePublication
fsc.evidenceCategoryFSC impact-related
fsc.focus.sustainDimensionSocial
fsc.focus.sustainDimensionEnvironmental
fsc.subjectForests
fsc.subjectEnvironmental Impacts
fsc.subjectSocial Impacts
fsc.subjectCertification
fsc.subjectBrazil
fsc.subjectBiodiversity
fsc.subjectPesticides
fsc.subjectPlantations
fsc.subjectCommunity-based Forest Management
fsc.subjectTraditional Forest Use
is.availability.fullTextFull text available
is.contributor.funderTypePrivate funds (NGOs, companies, VSS self-funded etc)
is.contributor.memberForest Stewardship Council
is.evaluation.dataSourceIndependent researcher data
is.evidenceSubTypeOther resources - thought leadership pieces
is.evidenceTypeBriefing or opinion
is.focus.productsOther forestry and logging
is.focus.sdgSDG 15 - Life on Land
is.focus.sectorsAgriculture
is.focus.sectorsForestry
is.focus.sustainDimensionSocial
is.focus.sustainDimensionEnvironmental
is.focus.sustainIssueRights of indigenous peoples and local communities
is.focus.sustainIssuePlant and wildlife conservation
is.focus.sustainLensTransnational governance
is.focus.sustainOutcomeGovernance mechanisms
is.focus.sustainOutcomeSpecies Composition
is.focus.systemElementMandE outcomes and impacts
is.focus.systemElementMandE performance monitoring
is.identifier.codeImpacts
is.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.2305/iucn.ch.2014.policymatters-21.en
is.identifier.fscdoihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34800/fsc-international394
is.identifier.schemeNameForest Stewardship Council
is.identifier.schemeTypeVoluntary Sustainability Standards
is.item.reviewStatusPeer reviewed
Download