Publication:
Does forest certification matter? An analysis of operation-level changes required during the SmartWood certification process in the United States

dc.contributor.authorNewsom, D.
dc.contributor.authorCashore, B.
dc.contributor.authorBahn, V.
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-23T18:56:43Z
dc.date.available2022-01-23T18:56:43Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://open.fsc.org/handle/resource/819
dc.titleDoes forest certification matter? An analysis of operation-level changes required during the SmartWood certification process in the United Statesen
dcterms.accessRightsPublic
dcterms.accessRightsLimited access
dcterms.issued2006
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
fsc.evidenceCategoryFSC impact-related
fsc.focus.sustainDimensionEconomic
fsc.focus.sustainDimensionSocial
fsc.focus.sustainDimensionEnvironmental
fsc.subjectForests
fsc.subjectCertification
is.availability.fullTextFull text available
is.contributor.memberForest Stewardship Council
is.coverage.countryUnited States of America
is.coverage.countryAlpha2US
is.coverage.regionNorth America
is.evaluation.quotesBetween 2006 and 2013, 34 logging concessions achieved FSC forest management certification in Loreto, Madre de Dios and Ucayali under this regulatory context (FSC Peru and WWF Peru). Timber companies now operate 550,516.54 certified ha of forest under FSC forest management certificates. [...] In total, 940.000 ha were operated under FSC certificates as of 2014 (Cerutti et al., 2014).
is.evaluation.quotesWe presented statistics and panel regressions using concession-level data to conclude that, at the least for these data and this time period, we find very little deforestation impacts of certification.
is.evaluation.quotesEven what is measured in the forest seems likely to change. The effects of selective logging, and thus very likely of FSC certification, may take the form of changes in level of forest degradation. That is a more subtle change than deforestation, yet can be absolutely critical to the provision of ecosystem services including carbon storage and species habitat.
is.evidenceTypeEmpirical study
is.extent.number3
is.extent.pages197-208
is.extent.volume9
is.focus.sectorsAgriculture
is.focus.sectorsForestry
is.focus.sustainDimensionEconomic
is.focus.sustainDimensionSocial
is.focus.sustainDimensionEnvironmental
is.focus.systemElementMandE outcomes and impacts
is.focus.systemElementMandE performance monitoring
is.identifier.codeImpacts
is.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2005.06.007
is.identifier.fscdoihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34800/fsc-international569
is.identifier.schemeNameForest Stewardship Council
is.identifier.schemeTypeVoluntary Sustainability Standards
is.item.reviewStatusPeer reviewed
is.journalNameForest Policy and Economics
Download